Nasal high frequency oscillatory highflow therapy in preterm infants: A randomized crossover trial

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and potential physiological mechanisms of highflow therapy with superimposed high frequency oscillations (“osciflow”).Study DesignIn this prospective, randomized, single center crossover trial, 30 preterm infants were randomized to receive osciflow or highflow therapy first, each for 180 min. During osciflow, an oscillatory amplitude of 20 mbar and a frequency of 6 Hz were set. The flow rate was 4 L/min during both interventions. Primary outcome was the paired difference in the combined number of desaturations (SpO2 < 80%) and bradycardia (heart rate <80 beats per min) between interventions. Safety outcomes included nasal trauma, pneumothorax and treatment failure, and a pain score was assessed. In 20 infants, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) recordings were performed to evaluate oscillatory (VOsc) and tidal volumes (VT) at the lung level.ResultsInfants with a mean (SD) postnatal age of 33.1 ± 1.2 weeks were included. The median (IQR) number of episodes of desaturation and bradycardia was 19.5 (6−49) during osciflow and 26 (6−44) during highflow therapy (paired difference −2; IQR −10 to 9; p = .37). There were no differences in safety outcomes and pain scores. During osciflow, EIT recordings showed a signal at 6 Hz, which was not detectable during highflow. Corresponding mean (SD) VOsc/VT ratio was 9% (±5%).ConclusionsIn preterm infants, osciflow did not reduce the number of desaturations and bradycardia compared with highflow therapy. Although VOsc were transmitted to the lung during osciflow, their magnitude was small. Osciflow was safe and well tolerated.