Cyclical medication management interventions in health care settings: A systematic review

Author:

Meulenbroeks Isabelle1ORCID,Mercado Crisostomo1,Urwin Rachel1,Seaman Karla1,Kelly Anna1,Qadri Osman1,Westbrook Johanna1

Affiliation:

1. Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University North Ryde New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionIt is estimated that one in 30 patients experiences at least one preventable medication‐related harm while receiving care. Cyclical medicine improvement interventions, where health systems continuously collect data, implement prescribing/dispensing interventions, review outcomes, and revise the intervention, have demonstrated health outcome improvements in a range of health care settings. This systematic review aimed to synthesize information on the characteristics and outcomes of cyclical medication management interventions.MethodsFive databases were systematically searched for cyclical medication management interventions from 2000 to 2023. Studies were screened in a two‐step process: title/abstract and full‐text screening. All intervention, population, and outcome data were extracted. Intervention data were thematically categorized, and outcome data were categorized using Proctor's framework. The quality of data was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).ResultsForty‐five cyclical interventions from 46 publications were included. Most interventions studied cyclical medication management interventions in hospital settings (80%, n = 37) and utilized the plan‐do‐study‐act framework to guide intervention design (64%, n = 29). Cyclical medication management interventions comprised multiple components (mean 2.4 components), with common components including practice standardization (n = 23), clinician feedback (n = 20), and clinician education (n = 18). One hundred and twenty‐two outcome measures were extracted and categorized as implementation (n = 77), service (n = 41), and patient outcomes (n = 4). The quality of many publications was poor; 8 publications could not be scored or scored 0 on the MMAT, and the remaining publications scored on average (mean) 60% on the MMAT.ConclusionCyclical medication management interventions show weak evidence that they can be implemented successfully and improve health system and service outcomes. Significant further research and health system structuring are required to address the quality issues surrounding cyclical medication management implementation and reporting.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3