Flow Cytometry Method Validation Protocols

Author:

Selliah Nithianandan1,Nash Veronica1,Eck Steven2,Green Cherie3,Oldaker Teri4,Stewart Jennifer5,Vitaliti Alessandra6,Litwin Virginia7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cerba Research Lake Success New York

2. AstraZeneca Gaithersburg Maryland

3. Ozette Technologies Seattle Washington

4. Independent Consultant San Clemente California

5. Flow Contract Site Laboratory LLC Bothell Washington

6. Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research Novartis Pharma AG Basel Switzerland

7. Eurofins BioPharma Services Montréal Québec Canada

Abstract

AbstractAnalytical method validation provides a means to ensure that data are credible and reproducible. This article will provide a brief introduction to analytical method validation as applied to cellular analysis by flow cytometry, along with practical procedures for four different types of validation. The first, Basic Protocol 1 (the limited validation protocol), is recommended for research and non‐regulated laboratories. Next, Basic Protocol 2) presents a reasonable, fit‐for‐purpose validation approach appropriate for biopharma and research settings. Basic Protocol 3 addresses the type of validation performed in clinical laboratories for moderate‐risk tests developed in house. Finally, Basic Protocol 4 describes the process that should be applied whenever a method is being transferred from one facility to another. All four validation plans follow the fit‐for‐purpose validation approach, in which the validation parameters are selected based on the intended use of the assay. These validation protocols represent the minimal requirement and may not be applicable for every intended use such as high‐risk clinical assays or data to be used as a primary endpoint in a clinical trial. The recommendations presented here are consistent with the white papers published by the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists and the International Clinical Cytometry Society, as well as with Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute Guideline H62: Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry (CLSI, 2021). © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol 1: Limited validationBasic Protocol 2: Fit‐for‐purpose validation for biopharma and research settingsBasic Protocol 3: Validation for moderate clinical risk laboratory developed testsBasic Protocol 4: Transfer validationThis article was corrected on 25 January 2024. See the end of the full text for details.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Health Informatics,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Neuroscience

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3