Affiliation:
1. Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
2. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle Washington USA
3. St Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA
4. Duke University Durham North Carolina USA
5. Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine Denver Colorado USA
6. Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundTreatment exposures for childhood cancer reduce ovarian reserve. However, the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) among female survivors is not well established.MethodsFive‐year survivors of childhood cancer in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, which captures national ART outcomes. The authors assessed the live birth rate, the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and associations with treatment exposure using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple ovarian stimulations per individual. Siblings from a random sample of survivors were recruited to serve as a comparison group.ResultsAmong 9885 female survivors, 137 (1.4%; median age at diagnosis, 10 years [range, 0–20 years]; median years of follow‐up after age 18 years, 11 years [range, 2–11 years]) underwent 224 ovarian stimulations using autologous or donor eggs and/or gestational carriers (157 autologous ovarian stimulation cycles, 67 donor ovarian stimulation cycles). In siblings, 33 (1.4%) underwent 51 autologous or donor ovarian stimulations. Of those who used embryos from autologous eggs without using gestational carriers, 97 survivors underwent 155 stimulations, resulting in 49 live births, for a 31.6% chance of live birth per ovarian stimulation (vs. 38.3% for siblings; p = .39) and a 43.9% chance of live birth per transfer (vs. 50.0%; p = .33). Prior treatment with cranial radiation therapy (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20–0.97) and pelvic radiation therapy (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15–0.73) resulted in a reduced chance of live birth compared with siblings. The likelihood of live birth after ART treatment in survivors was not affected by alkylator exposure (cyclophosphamide‐equivalent dose, ≥8000 mg/m2 vs. none; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.52–2.05).ConclusionsChildhood cancer survivors are as likely to undergo treatment using ART as sibling controls. The success of ART treatment was not reduced after alkylator exposure. The results from the current study provide needed guidance on the use of ART in this population.