Total body irradiation‐free haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation compared to related and unrelated donor transplantation in pediatrics with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most prevalent childhood cancer under the age of 15 years. Despite the recent advances in therapeutic regimens, relapse occurs in 15%–20% of pediatric patients after chemotherapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the best treatment option. However, donor availability is one of the major challenges. Over the last decade, haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation has evolved as an alternative option. Herein, we aimed to compare the transplant outcomes in pediatric patients receiving total body irradiation (TBI)‐free myeloablative regimens, between non‐HID and HID transplant.Patients and methodsThe study included 60 pediatric ALL patients who had undergone HSCT from October 2016 until September 2020. Forty‐three patients received non‐HID HSCT, while 17 patients received HID. The sources of stem cells (SC) were peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for all the patients. The conditioning regimen was based on busulfan and cyclophosphamide. For graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, patients received cyclosporine and methotrexate in the setting of non‐HID transplantation, where HIDs received post‐transplant cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide.ResultsThe cumulative incidences of 3‐year overall survival (OS) were 73.1%, 66.6%, and 69.5%, for matched sibling donor‐matched related donor (MSD‐MRD), matched unrelated donor‐mismatched unrelated donor (MUD‐MMUD), and HID groups, respectively (p = .85). The cumulative incidences of grade II–IV acute GvHD for the MRD, MUD‐MMUD, and HID groups were 29%, 41%, and 49%, respectively (p = .47). Furthermore, the 3‐year cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was MSD‐MRD: 70% versus MUD‐MMUD: 42% versus HID: 45% (p = .64). The 3‐year cumulative incidence of relapse post transplantation was 45%, 18%, and 45%, respectively, for the MSD‐MRD, MUD‐MMUD, and HID groups, and the differences were not statistically significant (p = .55). There was a higher risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in patients receiving HID transplants compared to those of non‐HIDs (p < .01).ConclusionOur results indicate that PBSC‐HID transplant outcomes in the setting of non‐TBI conditioning are comparable to those of non‐HIDs in pediatric ALL patients.