Acoustic resonance therapy is safe and effective for the treatment of nasal congestion in rhinitis: A randomized sham‐controlled trial

Author:

Luong Amber U.12ORCID,Yong Michael3ORCID,Hwang Peter H.4ORCID,Lin Bryant Y.5ORCID,Gopi Paramesh6,Mohan Vivek6,Ma Yifei4,Johnson Jacob7,Yen David M.8,DeMera Richard S.9,Bleier Benjamin S.10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery McGovern Medical School of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA

2. Center for Immunology and Autoimmune Diseases The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine for the Prevention of Human Diseases McGovern Medical School of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA

3. Pacific Neuroscience Institute Santa Monica California USA

4. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

5. Department of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

6. Sound Health Systems Los Altos California USA

7. San Francisco Otolaryngology Medical Group San Francisco California USA

8. Specialty Physician Associates Bethlehem Pennsylvania USA

9. DeMera Allergy Fresno California USA

10. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mass Eye and Ear Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAcoustic resonance therapy (ART) is a novel vibrational treatment that delivers patient‐specific resonant frequency acoustic energy to the sinonasal cavities. In a pilot study, ART was effective for the acute treatment of nasal congestion. We conducted a sham‐controlled randomized trial to validate the efficacy of ART when administered daily for 2 weeks.MethodsA total of 52 adult patients were enrolled in a multi‐center, randomized, double‐blinded, sham‐controlled, interventional study evaluating ART administered by a vibrational headband. Patients received either active treatment or a non‐therapeutic sham treatment twice daily over 2 weeks. Clinical endpoints were the average change in nasal congestion sub‐score of the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) and the average change in composite TNSS.ResultsART resulted in a significantly greater mean change in the nasal congestion sub‐score compared to sham (−0.87 [95% confidence interval [CI] −1.11, −0.62] vs. −0.44 [95% CI −0.64, −0.23], p = 0.008). ART also resulted in a significantly greater reduction in the composite TNSS versus sham, (−2.85 [95% CI −3.85, −1.85], vs. −1.32 [95% CI −2.27, −0.36], p = 0.027). The response rate, determined by a nasal congestion sub‐score minimal clinically important difference of 0.23, was 80.8% for ART and 46.2% for sham, with an adjusted risk ratio of 1.95 (95% CI 1.26, 3.02, p = 0.003) in favor of ART. Safety endpoints showed no adverse events.ConclusionART is a safe and effective non‐pharmacologic alternative for the treatment of nasal congestion.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Immunology and Allergy

Reference32 articles.

1. Epidemiology and burden of nasal congestion

2. KaloramaInformation.Global Over‐The‐Counter (OTC) drug markets.2018.https://kaloramainformation.com/product/global‐over‐the‐counter‐otc‐drug‐markets/

3. Autonomic nervous system evaluation in allergic rhinitis

4. The role of the nervous system in rhinitis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3