Clinical relevance of multiple sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer

Author:

Goyal A1,Newcombe R G2,Mansel R E1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Statistics and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

2. Epidemiology, Statistics and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Indiscriminate removal of axillary nodes may not be justified as it may potentially worsen the morbidity of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) procedure. This study examined the factors associated with removal of multiple sentinel lymph nodes and determined whether there was an upper threshold for the number of sentinel nodes that should be removed. Methods A total of 803 patients with breast cancer underwent successful SNB using peritumoral injection of 99mTc-labelled albumin colloid and Patent Blue V dye. SNB was followed by standard axillary treatment at the same operation in all patients. Results The mean number of sentinel nodes removed per procedure was 2·2 (range 1–9). Multiple sentinel nodes (mean 2·9, range 2–9) were found in 501 patients (62·4 per cent). The false-negative rate in patients who had one sentinel node harvested was 10 per cent, compared with 1 per cent in patients who had three or more nodes removed (P = 0·010). Factors associated with finding multiple sentinel nodes were age less than 50 years (P = 0·004), low body mass index (P < 0·001), tumour in the outer half of the breast (P = 0·013), sentinel node visualization on lymphoscintigraphy (P < 0·001) and an interval of 12 h or less between radioisotope injection and SNB (P = 0·014). For 99·6 per cent of node-positive tumours, metastasis was detected within the first four sentinel nodes removed. Conclusion The identification of multiple sentinel nodes, when present, reduced the false-negative rate. These data suggested that removal of more than four nodes was unnecessary.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3