Anaesthetic mortality in dogs: A worldwide analysis and risk assessment

Author:

Redondo José I.1ORCID,Otero Pablo E.2ORCID,Martínez‐Taboada Fernando34,Doménech Luis5,Hernández‐Magaña Eva Zoe1,Viscasillas Jaime6

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal Facultad de Veterinaria Universidad Cardenal Herrera ‐ CEU Valencia Spain

2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

3. Sydney School of Veterinary Science University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. 3A Animal Anaesthesia and Analgesia Victoria Australia

5. Departamento de Matemáticas Física y Ciencias Tecnológicas Escuela Superior de Enseñanzas Técnicas Universidad Cardenal Herrera ‐ CEU Valencia Spain

6. Anicura Valencia Sur Hospital Veterinario Valencia Spain

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEnsuring patient safety during small animal anaesthesia is crucial. This study aimed to assess anaesthetic‐related deaths in dogs globally, identify risks and protective factors and inform clinical practice.MethodsThis prospective cohort multicentric study involved 55,022 dogs from 405 veterinary centres across various countries. Data on anaesthesia‐related deaths from premedication to 48 hours post‐extubation were collected. Logistic regression was used to analyse patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, procedure type and anaesthetic drugs used.ResultsAnaesthetic‐related mortality was 0.69%. Most deaths occurred postoperatively (81%). Age, obesity and a higher ASA classification score were associated with increased mortality. Urgent procedures, non‐urgent but unscheduled anaesthesias and short procedures also had higher mortality. Some sedatives, systemic analgesics, hypnotics and the use of locoregional anaesthesia were linked to a decrease in mortality.LimitationsThe limitations of the study include the non‐randomised sample, potential selection bias, lack of response rate quantification, variable data quality control, subjectivity in classifying causes of death and limited analysis of variables.ConclusionCareful patient evaluation, drug selection and monitoring can be associated with reduced mortality. These findings can be used to develop guidelines and strategies to improve patient safety and outcomes. Further research is needed to refine protocols, enhance data quality systems and explore additional risk mitigation measures.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Veterinary,General Medicine

Reference65 articles.

1. Anesthetic mortality: a five‐year survey of the records of the Angell Memorial Animal Hospital;Albrecht DT;J Am Vet Med Assoc,1951

2. A survey of anaesthesia in small animal practice: AVA/BSAVA report;Clarke K;J Ass Vet Anaesth,1990

3. The risk of death: the confidential enquiry into perioperative small animal fatalities;Brodbelt DC;Vet Anaesth Analg,2008

4. Canine anaesthetic death in Spain: a multicentre prospective cohort study of 2012 cases;Gil L;Vet Anaesth Analg,2013

5. Association between preoperative characteristics and risk of anaesthesia‐related death in dogs in small‐animal referral hospitals in Japan;Itami T;Vet Anaesth Analg,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3