Allostatic load and risk of all‐cause, cancer‐specific, and cardiovascular mortality in older cancer survivors: An analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2010

Author:

Yang Danting1ORCID,Wheeler Meghann1,Karanth Shama D.23,Aduse‐Poku Livingstone1,Leeuwenburgh Christiaan4,Anton Stephen4,Guo Yi35,Bian Jiang35,Liang Muxuan36,Yoon Hyung‐Suk23ORCID,Akinyemiju Tomi78,Braithwaite Dejana123,Zhang Dongyu9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions Gainesville Florida USA

2. Department of Surgery University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville Florida USA

3. University of Florida Health Cancer Center Gainesville Florida USA

4. Department of Physiology and Aging University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville Florida USA

5. Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville Florida USA

6. Department of Biostatistics University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions Gainesville Florida USA

7. Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine Duke University Durham North Carolina USA

8. Duke Cancer Institute School of Medicine Duke University Durham North Carolina USA

9. Medical Device Epidemiology and Real‐World Data Science Johnson & Johnson New Brunswick New Jersey USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAllostatic load (AL) has been linked to an increased risk of death in various populations. However, to date, there is no research specifically investigating the effect of AL on mortality in older cancer survivors.AimsTo investigate the association between AL and mortality in older cancer survivors.MethodA total of 1291 adults aged 60 years or older who survived for ≥1 year since cancer diagnoses were identified from the 1999 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. AL was the exposure of interest incorporating nine clinical measures/biomarkers; one point was added to AL if any of the measures/biomarkers exceeded the normal level. The sum of points was categorized as an ordinal variable to reflect low, moderate, and high ALs. Our outcomes of interest were all‐cause, cancer‐specific, and cardiovascular disease–specific mortality. Death was identified by linkage to the National Death Index. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of mortality by AL category.ResultsOverall, 53.6% of participants were male and 78.4% were white. The mean age of study participants at interview was 72.8 years (standard deviation = 7.1). A total of 546 participants died during the follow‐up (median follow‐up time: 8.0 years). Among them, 158 died of cancer, and 106 died of cardiovascular events. Results from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that higher ALS was positively associated with higher all‐cause mortality (ALS = 4–9 vs. ALS = 0–1: aHR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.17–1.98, p‐trend < 0.01) and higher cancer‐specific mortality (ALS = 4–9 vs. ALS = 0–1: aHR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.12–2.90, p‐trend = 0.01). The association between ALS and cardiovascular mortality was positive but nonsignificant (ALS = 4–9 vs. ALS = 0–1: aHR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.86–2.94, p‐trend = 0.11).ConclusionsOur study suggests that older cancer survivors can have a higher risk of death if they have a high burden of AL.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference39 articles.

1. National Cancer Institute. Age and Cancer Risk.https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/age. Published April 29 2015. Accessed March 10 2022.

2. Cancer Survivorship

3. New directions in cancer and aging: State of the science and recommendations to improve the quality of evidence on the intersection of aging with cancer control

4. Stress and the Individual

5. Allostatic load: when protection gives way to damage;McEwen B;Adv Mind Body Med,2003

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3