Pain catastrophizing and trunk co‐contraction during lifting in people with and without chronic low back pain: A cross sectional study

Author:

Ippersiel Patrick12ORCID,Preuss Richard12,Kim Byungjin1,Giannini Cristina1,Robbins Shawn M.12

Affiliation:

1. School of Physical and Occupational Therapy McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada

2. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation Lethbridge‐Layton‐Mackay Rehabilitation Centre Montreal Quebec Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTrunk co‐contraction during lifting may reflect a guarded motor response to a threatening task. This work estimated the impact of pain catastrophizing on trunk co‐contraction during lifting, in people with and without low back pain.MethodsAdults with high pain catastrophizing (back pain: n = 29, healthy: n = 7) and low pain catastrophizing (back pain: n = 20, healthy: n = 11), performed 10 repetitions of a lifting task. Electromyography data of rectus abdominis, erector spinae and external oblique muscles were collected, bilaterally. Co‐contraction indices were determined for rectus abdominis/erector spinae and external oblique/erector spinae pairings, bilaterally. Pain catastrophizing was measured using the pain catastrophizing scale and task‐specific fear using the Photograph series of daily activities scale. Three‐way mixed ANOVAs tested the effects of group (back pain vs. healthy), pain catastrophizing (high vs. low), lifting phase (lifting vs. replacing) and their interactions.ResultsThere were no main effects of pain catastrophizing, lifting phase, nor any interactions (p > 0.05). Group effects revealed greater co‐contraction for bilateral erector spinae/rectus abdominis pairings (but not erector spinae‐external oblique pairings) in people with back pain, compared to healthy participants, independent of pain catastrophizing and lifting phase (p < 0.05). Spearman correlations associated greater task‐specific fear and greater erector spinae‐left external oblique co‐contraction, only in people with back pain (p < 0.05).ConclusionsGreater co‐contraction in the back pain group occurred independent of pain catastrophizing, as measured with a general questionnaire. A task‐specific measure of threat may be more sensitive to detecting relationships between threat and co‐contraction.Significance StatementThis work contributes evidence that people with back pain commonly exhibit trunk co‐contraction when lifting. The lack of a relationship between pain catastrophizing and trunk co‐contraction, however, challenges evidence linking psychological factors and guarded motor behaviour in this group. Together, this suggests that other factors may be stronger determinants of co‐contraction in people with LBP or that a general construct like pain catastrophizing may not accurately represent this relationship.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3