Long‐term effects of surgically corrected menstrual outflow obstruction: A case–control study

Author:

Martens Lisanne1,Spath Marian A.1,van Beek Monique A.1,Willemsen Wim N. P.1,Kluivers Kirsten B.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Nijmegen The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo enhance evidence‐based knowledge on long‐term sequalae in patients with surgically corrected obstructing Müllerian anomalies.MethodsThis long‐term case–control study included patients with menstrual outflow obstruction due to congenital anomalies of the uterus or vagina, who were at least 18 years old, and for whom 2 years had elapsed since the first surgery at the start of this study. The control group consisted of women without current gynecological problems. Patients underwent a surgical correction at the Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen between 1980 and 2013. Of 78 patients approached, 38 (49%) were included in this study. The control group consisted of 54 females. The main outcome measures were pain and health state. The following questionnaires were used: Visual Analogue Scale pain scores, European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ‐5D‐3L) and the adapted Endometriosis Health Profile questionnaire (EHP‐30).ResultsPatients had higher actual and maximum abdominal pain scores compared with controls (11 vs 0 [P = 0.007] and 48 vs 21 [P = 0.035], respectively). Based on the EQ‐5D‐3L scores, patients had more pain and discomfort (P = 0.005), more mood problems (P = 0.023), and a poorer subjective health state (P = 0.002) and self‐rated health state (P = 0.031). Based on the EHP‐30, patients had a significant poorer self‐rated health state on four out of five subscales.ConclusionIn this study, following surgically corrected menstrual obstruction, patients had statistically significant higher abdominal pain scores and a poorer self‐rated health state compared with controls.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3