Toward a national eDNA strategy for the United States

Author:

Kelly Ryan P.1ORCID,Lodge David M.2,Lee Kai N.3,Theroux Susanna4ORCID,Sepulveda Adam J.5ORCID,Scholin Christopher A.6,Craine Joseph M.7,Andruszkiewicz Allan Elizabeth1,Nichols Krista M.8,Parsons Kim M.8,Goodwin Kelly D.9,Gold Zachary10,Chavez Francisco P.6,Noble Rachel T.11,Abbott Cathryn L.12,Baerwald Melinda R.13,Naaum Amanda M.14,Thielen Peter M.15,Simons Ariel Levi16,Jerde Christopher L.17ORCID,Duda Jeffrey J.18ORCID,Hunter Margaret E.19ORCID,Hagan John A.20,Meyer Rachel Sarah16,Steele Joshua A.4,Stoeckle Mark Y.21ORCID,Bik Holly M.22ORCID,Meyer Christopher P.23,Stein Eric4,James Karen E.24,Thomas Austen C.25ORCID,Demir‐Hilton Elif26,Timmers Molly A.27,Griffith John F.4,Weise Michael J.28,Weisberg Stephen B.4

Affiliation:

1. University of Washington, School of Marine and Environmental Affairs Seattle Washington USA

2. Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

3. Owl of Minerva LLC Indianapolis Indiana USA

4. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority Costa Mesa California USA

5. U.S. Geological Survey Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center Bozeman Montana USA

6. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Moss Landing California USA

7. Jonah Ventures Boulder Colorado USA

8. Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington USA

9. Atlantic Oceanographic & Meterological Laboratory (stationed at Southwest Fisheries Science Center) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration La Jolla California USA

10. NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Seattle Washington USA

11. Department of Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Marine Sciences UNC Chapel Hill Morehead North Carolina USA

12. Pacific Biological Station Fisheries and Oceans Canada Nanaimo British Columbia Canada

13. Division of Integrated Science and Engineering California Department of Water Resources Sacramento California USA

14. NatureMetrics North America Ltd Guelph Ontario Canada

15. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel Maryland USA

16. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz California USA

17. University of California Santa Barbara California USA

18. U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center Seattle Washington USA

19. U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center Gainesville Florida USA

20. Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Olympia Washington USA

21. Program for the Human Environment The Rockefeller University New York New York USA

22. Department of Marine Sciences and Institute of Bioinformatics University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA

23. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington District of Columbia USA

24. Maine Center for Genetics in the Environment University of Maine Orono Maine USA

25. Molecular Division Smith‐Root, Inc Vancouver Washington USA

26. Oceankind Palo Alto California USA

27. National Geographic Society Washington District of Columbia USA

28. Office of Naval Research, Marine Mammals & Biology Program Arlington Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) data make it possible to measure and monitor biodiversity at unprecedented resolution and scale. As use‐cases multiply and scientific consensus grows regarding the value of eDNA analysis, public agencies have an opportunity to decide how and where eDNA data fit into their mandates. Within the United States, many federal and state agencies are individually using eDNA data in various applications and developing relevant scientific expertise. A national strategy for eDNA implementation would capitalize on recent scientific developments, providing a common set of next‐generation tools for natural resource management and public health protection. Such a strategy would avoid patchwork and possibly inconsistent guidelines in different agencies, smoothing the way for efficient uptake of eDNA data in management. Because eDNA analysis is already in widespread use in both ocean and freshwater settings, we focus here on applications in these environments. However, we foresee the broad adoption of eDNA analysis to meet many resource management issues across the nation because the same tools have immediate terrestrial and aerial applications.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3