Is sentinel lymph node biopsy needed for lentigo maligna melanoma?

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an area of debate in the management of lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM). The utility of SLNB and its prognostic value in LMM have not yet been studied with large databases.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2012−2020) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (2010−2019) database for patients with cutaneous nonmetastatic LMM with Breslow thickness >1.0 mm. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with SLNB performance and sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity. Univariable and multivariable analyses assessed overall survival (OS) and melanoma‐specific survival (MSS) based on SLNB performance and SLN status.ResultsCompared to other melanoma subtypes, LMM had lower rates of SLNB (66.6% vs. 80.0%−84.0%) and SLN positivity (11.3% vs. 18.6%−34.2%). Compared to patients who did not undergo SLNB, SLN status was significantly associated with improved OS in patients with SLN positive (HR = 0.64 [0.55−0.76]) and SLN negative (HR = 0.68 [0.49−0.94]), and worse MSS only in patients with positive SLN (HR = 3.93, p < 0.05).ConclusionThe improved OS associated with SLNB likely implies surgical selection bias. Analysis of MSS confirms appropriate patient selection and suggests important prognostic value associated with SLN status. These results support continued SLNB for LMM patients according to standard guidelines.