The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review

Published:2021-02-07 Issue:1 Volume:17 Page:
ISSN:1891-1803
Container-title:Campbell Systematic Reviews
language:en
Short-container-title:Campbell Systematic Reviews

Author:

Wang Xiaoqin¹²³,Welch Vivian⁴,Li Meixuan¹,Yao Liang⁵,Littell Julia⁶,Li Huijuan¹,Yang Nan¹,Wang Jianjian¹⁷,Shamseer Larissa⁸⁹,Chen Yaolong¹,Yang Kehu¹,Grimshaw Jeremy M.²¹⁰

Affiliation:

1. Evidence‐based Medicine Centre of Lanzhou University Lanzhou China

2. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

3. Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

4. Bruyère Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

5. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

6. Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research, Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr Pennsylvania USA

7. School of Public Health, Lanzhou University Lanzhou China

8. School of Public Health, University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

9. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada

10. Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Social Sciences

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cl2.1134

Reference27 articles.

1. Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: A cross‐sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool;Almeida M. O.;Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy,2019

2. Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews on therapeutic interventions for oral cancer

3. Campbell Systematic Reviews. (2010). Author Guidelines‐co‐registration policy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/18911803/homepage/author-guidelines

4. Campbell Collaboration.& (2018).What is a systematic review?.https://campbellcollaboration.org/research-resources/writing-a-campbell-systematic-review/systemic-review.html

5. Meta-Review: Network Meta-Analyses in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods;Campbell Systematic Reviews;2024-08-21

2. Various application roles for Campbell systematic reviews: a citation analysis;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-02

3. Risk of bias and open science practices in systematic reviews of educational effectiveness: A meta‐review;Review of Education;2023-11-30

4. Using bench protocol platforms to improve compliance with systematic review guidance documents and reporting checklists: Proof of concept;Evidence-Based Toxicology;2023-10-30

5. Methodological quality of Campbell Systematic Reviews has improved over the past decade;Campbell Systematic Reviews;2023-09-26