Development and comparison of model‐integrated evidence approaches for bioequivalence studies with pharmacokinetic end points

Author:

Chen Xiaomei1ORCID,Nyberg Henrik B.1ORCID,Donnelly Mark2ORCID,Zhao Liang2ORCID,Fang Lanyan2ORCID,Karlsson Mats O.1ORCID,Hooker Andrew C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden

2. Division of Quantitative Methods and Modeling Office of Research Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractBy applying nonlinear mixed‐effect (NLME) models, model‐integrated evidence (MIE) approaches are able to analyze bioequivalence (BE) data with pharmacokinetic end points that have sparse sampling, which is problematic for non‐compartmental analysis (NCA). However, MIE approaches may suffer from inflation of type I error due to underestimation of parameter uncertainty and to the assumption of asymptotic normality. In this study, we developed a MIE BE analysis method that is based on a pre‐defined model and consists of several steps including model fitting, uncertainty assessment, simulation, and BE determination. The presented MIE approach has several improvements compared with the previously reported model‐integrated methods: (1) treatment, sequence, and period effects are only added to absorption parameters (such as relative bioavailability and rate of absorption) instead of all PK parameters; (2) a simulation step is performed to generate confidence intervals of the pharmacokinetic metrics for BE assessment; and (3) in an effort to maintain type I error, two more advanced parameter uncertainty evaluation approaches are explored, a nonparametric (case resampling) bootstrap, and sampling importance resampling (SIR). To evaluate the developed method and compare the uncertainty assessment methods, simulation experiments were performed for BE studies using a two‐way crossover design with different amounts of information (sparse to rich designs) and levels of variability. Based on the simulation results, the method using SIR for parameter uncertainty quantification controls type I error at the nominal level of 0.05 (i.e., the significance level set for BE evaluation) even for studies with small sample size and/or sparse sampling. As expected, our MIE approach for BE assessment exhibited higher power than the NCA‐based method, especially as the data becomes sparser and/or more variable.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference23 articles.

1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Guidance for industry: Bioequivalence Studies with Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Drugs Submitted under an ANDA Guidance for Industry.2021.

2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Guidance for industry: statistical approaches to establishing bioequivalence.2022.

3. European Medicines Agency (EMA).Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence.2010.

4. Model-based analyses of bioequivalence crossover trials using the stochastic approximation expectation maximisation algorithm

5. Bioequivalence Tests Based on Individual Estimates Using Non-compartmental or Model-Based Analyses: Evaluation of Estimates of Sample Means and Type I Error for Different Designs

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3