Interpretation of in vitro concentration‐response data for risk assessment and regulatory decision‐making: Report from the 2022 IWGT quantitative analysis expert working group meeting

Author:

Beal Marc A.1ORCID,Chen Guangchao2,Dearfield Kerry L.3,Gi Min4,Gollapudi Bhaskar5,Heflich Robert H.6,Horibata Katsuyoshi7,Long Alexandra S.8,Lovell David P.9,Parsons Barbara L.6ORCID,Pfuhler Stefan10ORCID,Wills John11,Zeller Andreas12ORCID,Johnson George13ORCID,White Paul A.14

Affiliation:

1. Bureau of Chemical Safety, Health Products and Food Branch Health Canada Ottawa Ontario Canada

2. Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Utrecht the Netherlands

3. Retired from US Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Agriculture Washington DC USA

4. Department of Environmental Risk Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Metropolitan University Osaka Japan

5. Toxicology Consultant Midland Michigan USA

6. National Center for Toxicological Research US Food and Drug Administration Jefferson Arkansas USA

7. Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis National Institute of Health Sciences Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan

8. Existing Substances Risk Assessment Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch Health Canada Ottawa Ontario Canada

9. St George's Medical School University of London London UK

10. Global Product Stewardship ‐ Human Safety Procter & Gamble Cincinnati Ohio USA

11. Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety GSK Research & Development Stevenage UK

12. Pharmaceutical Sciences, pRED Innovation Center Basel Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd Basel Switzerland

13. Swansea University Medical School Swansea University Swansea UK

14. Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch Health Canada Ottawa Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractQuantitative risk assessments of chemicals are routinely performed using in vivo data from rodents; however, there is growing recognition that non‐animal approaches can be human‐relevant alternatives. There is an urgent need to build confidence in non‐animal alternatives given the international support to reduce the use of animals in toxicity testing where possible. In order for scientists and risk assessors to prepare for this paradigm shift in toxicity assessment, standardization and consensus on in vitro testing strategies and data interpretation will need to be established. To address this issue, an Expert Working Group (EWG) of the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) evaluated the utility of quantitative in vitro genotoxicity concentration‐response data for risk assessment. The EWG first evaluated available in vitro methodologies and then examined the variability and maximal response of in vitro tests to estimate biologically relevant values for the critical effect sizes considered adverse or unacceptable. Next, the EWG reviewed the approaches and computational models employed to provide human‐relevant dose context to in vitro data. Lastly, the EWG evaluated risk assessment applications for which in vitro data are ready for use and applications where further work is required. The EWG concluded that in vitro genotoxicity concentration‐response data can be interpreted in a risk assessment context. However, prior to routine use in regulatory settings, further research will be required to address the remaining uncertainties and limitations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Genetics (clinical),Epidemiology

Reference104 articles.

1. Alternative (non‐animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010;Adler S.;Archives of Toxicology,2011

2. Carcinogens as frameshift mutagens: metabolites and derivatives of 2‐acetylaminofluorene and other aromatic amine carcinogens;Ames B.N.;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1972

3. An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens;Ames B.N.;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1973

4. Epoxides of carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbons are frameshift mutagens;Ames B.N.;Science,1972

5. Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection;Ames B.N.;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1973

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3