Through their eyes: Understanding institutional factors that impact the transfer processes of Black engineering students

Author:

Berhane Bruk1ORCID,Buenaflor Shannon2ORCID,Lee Eunsil3ORCID,Liu Jingjing1ORCID,Najera Gabriel4

Affiliation:

1. School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education & STEM Transformation Institute, Florida International University Miami Florida USA

2. Engineering Academic Services A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA

3. Department of Engineering Education University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA

4. Najera Consulting Group Hinsdale Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe potential for broadening participation in engineering among Black undergraduates via transfer pathways is considerable, given their large share of the community college population. By understanding the opportunities and challenges presented within the context of transfer, this potential can be realized.Purpose/hypothesisThe goal of this study is to explore ways in which Black students who transitioned from a community college to a 4‐year engineering program describe the institutional factors affecting their transfer processes.Design/methodDrawing from a 3‐year qualitative research study involving approximately 27 Black engineering transfer students at a large, predominantly White, institution, we present data derived through interviews and focus groups with these undergraduates.ResultsParticipants expressed that they benefited from supportive institutional agents who offered engineering transfer‐related resources. These included both faculty and advisors in their mostly Minority Serving Community Colleges (MSCCs) as well as advisors from the engineering college at the 4‐year institution. In addition, respondents described being part of a number of community college programs, including some for Black collegians, that offered resources for transfer. Nonetheless, some participants shared problems that emerged during the transfer process, including having to self‐navigate confusing transfer websites or self‐advocate to resolve erroneous admissions decisions.ConclusionsWe suggest a need to elevate MSCCs as learning environments that can produce future Black engineers. We also recommend a systems‐level approach that brings together community colleges and 4‐year institutions while also accounting for issues related to resources as well as power dynamics that students may encounter.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference79 articles.

1. 50k Coalition Data Council. (2022a).Undergraduate engineering enrollments. [Data file]. Prepared by Yoder Yamashita Group.

2. 50k Coalition Data Council. (2022b).Number of students who received an engineering bachelor's degree. [Data file]. Prepared by Yoder Yamashita Group.

3. American Association of Community Colleges. (2022).Fast facts.https://www.aacc.nche.edu/2022/02/28/42888/

4. American Society for Engineering Education. (2019).Total U.S. engineering enrollment[Data file].https://www.asee.org

5. A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3