Intra‐articular corticosteroid injections provide a clinically relevant benefit compared to placebo only at short‐term follow‐up in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Bensa Alessandro1ORCID,Albanese Jacopo1,Boffa Angelo2,Previtali Davide1,Filardo Giuseppe134

Affiliation:

1. Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery EOC Lugano Switzerland

2. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy

3. Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy

4. Faculty of Biomedical Sciences Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo quantify the clinical relevance of intra‐articular corticosteroid effects compared to placebo for the injective treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched on May 3, 2023. This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English, with no time limitation regarding publication date, comparing intra‐articular corticosteroids and placebo injections for knee OA. The effects were quantified at short‐ (≤6 weeks), mid‐ (>6 weeks and ≤3 months), and long‐term (≥6 months) follow‐ups. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the outcomes (visual analogue scale for pain ‐ VAS: 1.4, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ‐ WOMAC: 9) was used to interpret the clinical improvement provided by intra‐articular corticosteroid injections compared to placebo. The quality of each article was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the GRADE guidelines.ResultsAmong the 1030 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs (842 patients) were included. A comparison of the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in the improvement of VAS and WOMAC scores in terms of the mean difference (MD); this difference was in favour of corticosteroids at short‐term (p < 0.001, MD = −1.6 and p < 0.001, MD = −9.9, respectively) and mid‐term follow‐ups (p = 0.001, mean MD = −1.3 and p = 0.005, MD = −4.9, respectively). No difference was observed at the long‐term follow‐up. The MDs between the improvements in the two groups reached the MCID values for the VAS and WOMAC only at the short‐term follow‐up. The RoB 2 tool and the GRADE evaluations showed the presence of risk of bias and limited quality of evidence.ConclusionThis systematic review and meta‐analysis demonstrated that intra‐articular corticosteroid injections offer clinically perceivable pain relief and functional improvement higher than the placebo effect only at short‐term follow‐up in patients affected by knee OA, with benefits losing clinical relevance already after 6 weeks. These results, together with the low number and the limited quality of the RCTs comparing this treatment with placebo, question the indication for the use of corticosteroid injections in clinical practice for the treatment of knee OA.Level of EvidenceLevel I.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3