Utilizing nerve conduction studies to identify very early Guillain–Barré syndrome and distinguish it from mimics in emergency settings

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction/AimsAccurately diagnosing Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) in its early stages and distinguishing it from mimics poses challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of an existing electrodiagnostic criterion in very early GBS (VEGBS) for discerning mimics. Additionally, we explored specific electrophysiological abnormalities in VEGBS to design a new diagnostic criterion for more accurate VEGBS diagnosis.MethodsWe retrospectively identified all patients with flaccid quadriparesis initially suspected of GBS who underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS) ≤4 days from symptom onset. We then retrieved their NCS data and applied an existing electrodiagnostic criterion for sensitivity and specificity analyses based on the final discharge diagnosis. Furthermore, we designed a new criterion based on the observed electrophysiological abnormalities that have maximum specificity and at least 50% sensitivity.ResultsAmong 70 patients suspected of VEGBS, 44 (63%) received a final diagnosis of GBS, while in 26 (37%), the GBS diagnosis was later refuted. Umapathi's definite criterion exhibited a sensitivity of 61.36% and a specificity of 92.31%. The probable and possible groups showed very high sensitivity (90.91% and 100%, respectively); however, specificity was low (57.69% and 30.77%, respectively) in the very early stage. Our proposed criterion demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.64% (CI: 75.44%–96.21%) and a specificity of 96.15% (CI: 80.36%–99.90%).DiscussionThe criterion based on presumed electrophysiological correlates of specific early GBS pathophysiology proved more effective than the existing electrodiagnostic criterion in differentiating VEGBS from mimics.