Comparison of Zybio Kit and saponin in‐house method in rapid identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by EXS2600 matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry system

Author:

Peras Mislav1,Mareković Ivana23ORCID,Kuliš Tomislav4,Markanović Manda2,Budimir Ana23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiology Institute of Public Health Zagreb County Zaprešić Croatia

2. Department of Clinical Microbiology Infection Prevention and Control Zagreb Croatia

3. School of Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia

4. Department of Urology University Hospital Centre Zagreb Zagreb Croatia

Abstract

AbstractWe evaluated the performance of Zybio EXS2600 matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF MS) (Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China) for the identification of bacteria from positive blood culture (BC) bottles using Blood Culture Positive Sample Pretreatment Kit (Zybio Inc., Chongqing, China) in comparison to an in‐house saponin method. Following a positive signal by the BACTEC™ FX system, confirmation of identification was achieved using subcultured growing biomass used for MALDI‐TOF MS analysis. A total of 94 positive BC bottles with 97 bacterial isolates were analyzed. The overall identification rates at the genus and species levels for the saponin method were 89.7% (87/97) and 74.2% (72/97), respectively. With the Zybio Kit, 88.7% (86/97) and 80.4% (78/97) of microorganisms were correctly identified to the genus and species levels, respectively. The saponin method identified 65.3% (32/49) of Gram‐positive bacteria at the species level, whereas the Zybio Kit achieved a higher species‐level identification rate of 79.6% (39/49) (p = 0.1153). The saponin method with additional on‐plate formic acid extraction showed a significantly higher overall identification rate in comparison to the saponin method without that step for both genus (87.6% [85/97] vs. 70.1% [68/97], p = 0.0029) and species level (70.1% [68/97] vs. 46.4% [45/97], p = 0.0008). Identification rates of Gram‐negative bacteria showed a higher identification rate, however, not statistically significant with additional Zybio Kit protocol step on both genus (85.4% [41/48] vs. 81.3% [39/48], p = 0.5858) and species level (77.1% [37/48] vs. 75% [36/48], p = 0.8120). Zybio Kit could offer an advantage in species‐level identification, particularly for Gram‐positive bacteria. The inclusion of on‐plate formic acid extraction in the saponin method notably enhanced identification at both genus and species levels for Gram‐positive bacteria. The extended protocol provided by the Zybio Kit could potentially offer an advantage in the identification of Gram‐negative bacteria at both genus and species levels. Enhancements to the Zybio EXS2600 MALDI‐TOF instrument software database are necessary.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3