Diagnostic accuracy of barium enema versus full‐thickness rectal biopsy in children with clinically suspected Hirschsprung's disease: A comparative cross‐sectional study

Author:

Hailemariam Tesfahunegn12ORCID,Bekele Abenezer Kebede3,Manyazewal Tsegahun2,Solomon Daniel Zewdneh1,Gorfu Yocabel1,Shiwarega Zelalem4,Getinet Tewodros5,Wole Meti6,Solomon Samrawit5,Hailu Samuel Sisay1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, College of Health Sciences Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Ethiopia

2. Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT‐AFRICA), College of Health Sciences Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Ethiopia

3. Department of Radiology St. Peter's Specialized Hospital Addis Ababa Ethiopia

4. Department of Radiology Vision Speciality Clinic Addis Ababa Ethiopia

5. School of Public Health St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College Addis Ababa Ethiopia

6. Department of Internal Medicine Armed Forces Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Addis Ababa Ethiopia

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsHirschsprung's disease (HSD) remains a common cause of pediatric intestinal obstruction. Barium contrast enema (BE) is the primary imaging modality for the evaluation of clinically suspected cases. Here, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of BE in children with clinically suspected HSD when compared to a gold standard full‐thickness rectal biopsy (FTRB).MethodsWe recruited and consecutively enrolled children with clinically suspected HSD at two tertiary teaching hospitals. Participants underwent BE imaging and two radiologists interpreted the findings independently. Participants further underwent FTRB by pediatric surgeons as the confirmatory test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) with the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated on Stata version 14.2, taking FTRB as the standard.ResultsWe enrolled 55 cases, of which 49 completed the evaluation and were included in the final analysis. The median age was 9.4 months (interquartile range: 2–24], with a male‐to‐female ratio of 4.4:1. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of BE were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.81–0.99]), 0.73 (95% CI [0.39–0.94]), 0.92 (95% CI [0.82–0.97]), and 0.80 (95% CI [0.50–0.94]), respectively. On AUC, the diagnostic accuracy of BE compared to the confirmatory FTRB was 0.84 (95% CI [0.69–0.98]). The diagnostic accuracy was higher in neonates (ROC: 1.00) when compared to infants (ROC: 0.83) or those above 1 year of age (ROC: 0.798). HSD‐suggestive BE findings were associated with absence of ganglion cells on FTRB (χ2 = 23.301, p < 0.001). Inverted rectosigmoid ratio and transition zone were more sensitive in detecting HSD of 0.92 (95% CI [0.74–0.98]) and 0.81 (95% CI [0.63–0.92]), respectively.ConclusionBE is sufficiently accurate in the diagnosis of children with HSD, suggesting BE would likely be used to inform surgical management in settings where confirmatory biopsy is lacking. However, clinical judgment is warranted in interpreting negative BE findings.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3