Participatory modeling for high complexity, multi‐system issues: challenges and recommendations for balancing qualitative understanding and quantitative questions

Author:

Deutsch Arielle R.12ORCID,Frerichs Leah3,Perry Madeleine3,Jalali Mohammad S.45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Avera Research Institute, Avera Health Sioux Falls South Dakota USA

2. Sanford School of Medicine University of South Dakota Vermillion South Dakota USA

3. Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

4. MGH Institute for Technology Assessment Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractCommunity stakeholder participation can be incredibly valuable for the qualitative model development process. However, modelers often encounter challenges for participatory modeling projects focusing on high‐complexity, synergistic interactions between multiple issues, systems, and granularity. The diverse stakeholder perspectives and volumes of information necessary for developing such models can yield qualitative models that are difficult to translate into quantitative simulation or clear insight for informed decision‐making. There are few recommended best practices for developing high‐complexity, participatory models. We use an ongoing project as a case study to highlight three practical challenges for tackling high‐complexity, multi‐system issues with system dynamics tools. These challenges include balanced and respectful stakeholder engagement, defining boundaries and levels of variable aggregation, and timing and processes for qualitative/quantitative model integration. Our five recommendations to address these challenges serve as a foundation for further research on methods for developing translatable qualitative multi‐system models for informing actions for systemic change. © 2024 System Dynamics Society.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference107 articles.

1. A computational intelligence‐based method to ‘learn’ causal loop diagram‐like structures from observed data;Abdelbari H;System Dynamics Review,2017

2. ScriptsMap: A tool for designing multi‐method policy‐making workshops;Ackermann F;Omega,2011

3. New directions for participatory modelling in health: Redistributing expertise in relation to localised matters of concern;Adams S;Global Public Health,2021

4. AlbinS1997.Building a System Dynamics Model Part 1: Conceptualization.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3