The hedonic overdrive model best explains high‐fat diet‐induced obesity in C57BL/6 mice

Author:

Gao Lin123ORCID,Hu Sumei12,Yang Dengbao2,Wang Lu2,Togo Jacques2,Wu Yingga2,Li Baoguo2,Li Min12,Wang Guanlin2,Zhang Xueying12,Li Li2,Xu Yanchao2,Mazidi Moshen2,Couper Elspeth4,Whittington‐Davies Andrew4,Niu Chaoqun12,Speakman John R.1245ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Metabolic Health, Center for Energy Metabolism and Reproduction Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen China

2. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

4. Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

5. Institute of Public Health Sciences China Medical University Shenyang China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveHigh‐fat diets cause obesity in male mice; however, the underlying mechanisms remain controversial. Here, three contrasting ideas were assessed: hedonic overdrive, reverse causality, and passive overconsumption models.MethodsA total of 12 groups of 20 individually housed 12‐week‐old C57BL/6 male mice were exposed to 12 high‐fat diets with varying fat content from 40% to 80% (by calories), protein content from 5% to 30%, and carbohydrate content from 8.4% to 40%. Body weight and food intake were monitored for 30 days after 7 days at baseline on a standard low‐fat diet.ResultsAfter exposure to the diets, energy intake increased first, and body weight followed later. Intake then declined. The peak energy intake was dependent on both dietary protein and carbohydrate, but not the dietary fat and energy density, whereas the rate of decrease in intake was only related to dietary protein. On high‐fat diets, the weight of food intake declined, but despite this average reduction of 14.4 g in food intake, they consumed, on average, 357 kJ more energy than at baseline.ConclusionsThe hedonic overdrive model fit the data best. The other two models were not supported.

Funder

National Key Research and Development Program of China

Chinese Academy of Sciences

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3