FIGO recommendations: Use of midurethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Author:

Lau Hui‐Hsuan1234,Davila G. Willy5,Chen Ying‐Yu23,Sartori Marair G. F.6,Jármy‐Di Bella Zsuzsanna I. K.6,Tsai Jung‐Mei178ORCID,Liu Yu‐Min910,Su Tsung‐Hsien1238,

Affiliation:

1. MacKay Medical College New Taipei City Taiwan

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital Taipei Taiwan

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital Hsinchu Taiwan

4. MacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management Taipei Taiwan

5. Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Health, Holy Cross Medical Group Fort Lauderdale Florida USA

6. Department of Gynecology Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo SP Brazil

7. College of Nursing and Health Sciences Dayeh University Changhua Taiwan

8. Department of Nursing, MacKay Memorial Hospital Taipei Taiwan

9. Department of Medical Research, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital Hsinchu Taiwan

10. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital Hsinchu Taiwan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a global problem. It can significantly adversely impact a woman's quality of life. The use of synthetic mesh in vaginal surgery is controversial, especially when used for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Although negative effects have been reported, the synthetic mesh midurethral sling (MUS) is considered to be safe and effective in the surgical treatment of SUI.ObjectivesTo provide evidence‐based data and recommendations for the obstetrician/gynecologist who treats women with SUI and performs or plans to perform MUS procedures.MethodsAcademic searches of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar articles published between 1987 and March 2020 were performed by a subgroup of the Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO).Selection CriteriaThe obtained scientific data were associated with a level of evidence according to the Oxford University Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine and GRADE Working Group system. In the absence of concrete scientific evidence, the recommendations were made via professional consensus.ResultsThe FIGO Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee reviewed the literature and prepared this evidence‐based recommendations document for the use of MUS for women with SUI.ConclusionsDespite the extensive literature, there is a lack of consensus in the optimal surgical treatment of SUI. These recommendations provide a direction for surgeons to make appropriate decisions regarding management of SUI. The MUS is considered safe and effective in the treatment of SUI, based on many high‐quality scientific publications and professional society recommendations. Comprehensive long‐term data and systemic reviews are still needed, and these data will become increasingly important as women live longer. These recommendations will be continuously updated through future literature reviews.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3