Efficiency and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with anti‐PD1 therapy versus HAIC monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis

Author:

Li Yangyang1,Liu Wendao2,Chen Junwei3,Chen Yongxin1,Guo Jiandong1,Pang Huajin4,Zhang Wentao5,An Chao6,Li Chengzhi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University Guangzhou Guangdong P. R. China

2. Department of Interventional Therapy Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine and Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guangzhou Guangdong P. R. China

3. Department of Interventional Radiology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong P. R. China

4. Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of General Surgery Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong P. R. China

5. Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi P. R. China

6. Department of Minimal Invasive Intervention Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou P.R. China

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of combination therapy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and anti‐programmed cell death protein‐1 (PD‐1) therapy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsIn this retrospective clinical research, from March 2018 to December 2019, 1158 HCC patients categorized as BCLC stage C were reviewed for eligibility. We utilized propensity score matching (PSM) to mitigate initial disparities between the groups. The evaluation of the best tumor response was conducted in accordance with mRECIST 1.1 criteria. The difference in survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) between groups were compared.ResultsFollowing the eligibility review, 453 patients underwent a combined treatment of HAIC with PD1 inhibitors (HAIC‐PD1 group), while 221 patients received HAIC monotherapy (HAIC group) met the inclusion criteria and were finally enrolled in this study. In the entire cohort, the HAIC‐PD1 group exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (median overall survival: 40.4 months vs. 9.7 months, p < 0.001) and progression‐free survival (median progression‐free survival: 22.1 months vs. 5.8 months, p < 0.001). By propensity score, patients were matched according to baseline differences, resulting in all 442 patients in group HAIC‐PD1 (n = 221) and group HAIC (n = 221). After PSM adjustment, as well, the survival of the HAIC‐PD1 group was still distinctly longer than the HAIC group (median overall survival time, 40.4 months vs 9.7 months, p < 0.001; median progression‐free survival, 22.1 months vs 5.7 months, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariable analysis demonstrated that AFP level, metastasis, and therapeutic schedule were independent predictive factors for overall survival.ConclusionThe combination therapy of HAIC and PD1 inhibitors successfully extended OS to advanced HCC patients and could be a better choice than HAIC monotherapy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3