Anti‐bias training and perceived force climate: Links with prejudiced attitudes in United Kingdom policing

Author:

Legate Nicole1ORCID,Weinstein Netta2,Graham Les3,Plater Marisa3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago Illinois USA

2. School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences University of Reading Reading UK

3. Department of Management & Marketing Durham University Durham UK

Abstract

AbstractAnti‐bias training has been viewed as the solution to prejudice in organizations, yet the evidence is mixed in real‐world settings. Some point to the broader organizational climate that training takes place in as critical, and herein we investigate one aspect: communicating about bias in autonomy‐supportive (i.e., non‐shaming) ways. Using the 2019 National Well‐Being and Inclusion Survey of United Kingdom police officers and staff (n = 34,529 in 43 forces), we tested links of participating in anti‐bias training, perceived autonomy‐supportive communication, and their interaction on prejudiced attitudes. Results revealed a negligible effect (R2 = 0.001) of participating in anti‐bias training but a moderate effect (R2 = 0.05) of perceiving autonomy‐supportive communication predicting lower prejudice. Their interaction was significant but negligible (R2 = 0.001): participating in anti‐bias training predicted lower prejudice when perceiving autonomy‐supportive communication; there was no link between training and attitudes without autonomy‐supportive communication. Implications for improving the effectiveness of anti‐bias training in applied settings and research are discussed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference44 articles.

1. How autonomy support and ethical value alignment influences attitudes towards diversity in English police

2. Remediating Campus Climate: Implicit Bias Training is Not Enough

3. Atewologun D. Cornish T. &Tresh F.(2018).Anti‐bias training: An assessment of the evidence for effectiveness. Equality and Human Rights Commission Research ReportSeries. Retrieved fromhttps://cstar.ie/equality/t4media/ub_an_assessment_of_evidence_for_effectiveness.pdf

4. A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation.

5. Back to Basics with Mixed-Effects Models: Nine Take-Away Points

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3