Assessing risk for butterflies in the context of climate change, demographic uncertainty, and heterogeneous data sources

Author:

Forister Matthew L.1,Grames Eliza M.1ORCID,Halsch Christopher A.1,Burls Kevin J.2,Carroll Cas F.1,Bell Katherine L.1,Jahner Joshua P.3ORCID,Bradford Taylor A.1,Zhang Jing4,Cong Qian5,Grishin Nick V.46,Glassberg Jeffrey78,Shapiro Arthur M.9,Riecke Thomas V.1011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology University of Nevada Reno Nevada USA

2. Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Portland Oregon USA

3. Department of Botany University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming USA

4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute University of Texas Southwest Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

5. Institute for Protein Design and Department of Biochemistry University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

6. Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry University of Texas Southwest Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

7. North American Butterfly Association Morristown New Jersey USA

8. Department of BioSciences Rice University Houston Texas USA

9. Center for Population Biology University of California, Davis Davis California USA

10. Swiss Ornithological Institute Sempach Switzerland

11. Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana Missoula Montana USA

Abstract

AbstractOngoing declines in insect populations have led to substantial concern and calls for conservation action. However, even for relatively well studied groups, like butterflies, information relevant to species‐specific status and risk is scattered across field guides, the scientific literature, and agency reports. Consequently, attention and resources have been spent on a minuscule fraction of insect diversity, including a few well studied butterflies. Here we bring together heterogeneous sources of information for 396 butterfly species to provide the first regional assessment of butterflies for the 11 western US states. For 184 species, we use monitoring data to characterize historical and projected trends in population abundance. For another 212 species (for which monitoring data are not available, but other types of information can be collected), we use exposure to climate change, development, geographic range, number of host plants, and other factors to rank species for conservation concern. A phylogenetic signal is apparent, with concentrations of declining and at‐risk species in the families Lycaenidae and Hesperiidae. A geographic bias exists in that many species that lack monitoring data occur in the more southern states where we expect that impacts of warming and drying trends will be most severe. Legal protection is rare among the taxa with the highest risk values: of the top 100 species, one is listed as threatened under the US Endangered Species Act and one is a candidate for listing. Among the many taxa not currently protected, we highlight a short list of species in decline, including Vanessa annabella, Thorybes mexicanus, Euchloe ausonides, and Pholisora catullus. Notably, many of these species have broad geographic ranges, which perhaps highlights a new era of insect conservation in which small or fragmented ranges will not be the only red flags that attract conservation attention.

Funder

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3