Evaluation of Non‐Compressive Transvaginal Cervical Elastography as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Pregnancy

Abstract

ObjectivesNon‐compressive strain elastography has been proposed as a novel quantitative imaging biomarker for assessing the structure and function of the cervix. The current study aims to assess the repeatability, and intra‐ and inter‐observer reliability of transvaginal non‐compressive cervical strain elastography in a clinical setting.MethodsWe conducted a dual‐phase single‐center prospective feasibility study of singleton gestations >16‐weeks gestation that required a clinically‐indicated transvaginal ultrasound. Each study participant, n = 43 in phase 1 and n = 13 in phase 2, had elastography performed by two trained observers that each performed multiple image acquisitions. We performed a multivariable regression to adjust for changes in clinical characteristics between study phases and calculated the repeatability coefficients, limits of agreement, and intraclass correlations for each quantitative elastography parameter. We compared quantitative elastography parameters to cervical length measurements, acquired from the same images.ResultsThe repeatability coefficients and percent limits of agreement were wide for all of the quantitative elastography parameters, demonstrating poor repeatability. Intraclass correlation coefficients were poor–moderate for both intra‐observer (0.31–0.77) and inter‐observer reliability (0.35–0.77) in both study phases, while cervical length showed excellent reliability with intraclass correlations consistently >0.90.ConclusionsNon‐compressive transvaginal strain cervical elastography did not demonstrate adequate repeatability or reliability. Our results highlight the importance of rigorously assessing novel quantitative imaging biomarkers before clinical application.