Urological complications in women undergoing Cesarean section for placenta accreta spectrum disorders: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Lucidi A.1,Jauniaux E.2ORCID,Hussein A. M.3,Coutinho C. M.4ORCID,Tinari S.1,Khalil A.56ORCID,Shamshirsaz A.7,Palacios‐Jaraquemada J. M.8,D'Antonio F.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Fetal Care and High‐Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Chieti Chieti Italy

2. EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences University College London London UK

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Cairo Cairo Egypt

4. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto São Paolo Brazil

5. Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St George's University of London London UK

6. Fetal Medicine Unit, Liverpool Women's Hospital University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

7. Boston Children's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA

8. CEMIC University Hospital and School of Medicine Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo report on the occurrence of urological complications in women undergoing Cesarean section for placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS).MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane databases were searched electronically up to 1 November 2022. Studies reporting on the urological outcome of women undergoing Cesarean section for PAS were included. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction using a predefined protocol and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for observational studies, with disagreements resolved by consensus.The primary outcome was the overall occurrence of urological complications. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of any cystotomy, intentional cystotomy, unintentional cystotomy, ureteral damage, ureteral fistula and vesicovaginal fistula. All outcomes were explored in the overall population of women undergoing surgery for PAS. In addition, we performed subgroup analyses according to the type of surgery (Cesarean hysterectomy, or conservative surgery or management), severity of PAS at histopathology (placenta accreta/increta and placenta percreta), type of intervention (planned vs emergency) and number of cases per year. Random‐effects meta‐analyses of proportions were used to analyze the data.ResultsThere were 62 studies included in the systematic review and 56 were included in the meta‐analysis. Urological complications occurred in 15.2% (95% CI, 12.9–17.7%) of cases. Cystotomy complicated 13.5% (95% CI, 9.7–17.9%) of surgical operations. Intentional cystotomy was required in 7.7% (95% CI, 6.5–9.1%) of cases, while unintentional cystotomy occurred in 7.2% (95% CI, 6.0–8.5%) of cases. Urological complications occurred in 19.4% (95% CI, 16.3–22.7%) of cases undergoing hysterectomy and 12.2% (95% CI, 7.5–17.8%) of those undergoing conservative treatment. In the subgroup analyses, urological complications occurred in 9.4% (95% CI, 5.4–14.4%) of women with placenta accreta/increta and 38.5% (95% CI, 21.6–57.0%) of those described as having placenta percreta, and included mainly cystotomy (5.5% (95% CI, 0.6–15.1%) and 22.0% (95% CI, 5.4–45.5%), respectively). Urological complications occurred in 15.4% (95% CI, 8.1–24.6%) of cases undergoing a planned procedure and 24.6% (95% CI, 13.0–38.5%) of those undergoing an emergency intervention. In subanalysis of studies reporting on ≥ 12 cases per year, the incidence of urological complication was similar to that reported in the primary analysis.ConclusionsWomen undergoing surgery for PAS are at high risk of urological complication, mainly cystotomy. The incidence of these complications was particularly high in women described as having placenta percreta at birth and in those undergoing emergency surgical intervention. The high heterogeneity between the included studies highlights the need for a standardized protocol for the diagnosis of PAS to identify prenatal imaging signs associated with the increased risk of urological morbidity at delivery. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3