Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in term prelabor rupture of membranes: A retrospective cohort study using propensity‐score matching

Author:

Dan Liu1234,Lin Wu45,Hailong Li1234,Linan Zeng1234,Bin Wu6,Lingli Zhang1234

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu China

2. Evidence‐Based Pharmacy Center West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu China

3. NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation Chengdu China

4. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children Sichuan University, Ministry of Education Chengdu China

5. Department of Obstetrics West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu China

6. Medical Decision and Economic Group, Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, South Campus Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess whether earlier administration of antibiotic prophylaxis after prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term would decrease the incidence of maternal and neonatal infections.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study comparing women with term PROM who were initiated antibiotic prophylaxis within or after 6 h, and within or after 12 h from PROM to delivery during January 2019 to December 2021. Women with term PROM receiving cephalosporin and without contraindications to vaginal delivery or confirmed or suspected infection were included in the study. The primary outcome was puerperal infection, which refers to the reproductive tract infection occurring within 42 days of delivery. The type of pharmacoeconomic evaluation was selected based on the results of compared effectiveness between the early group and the late group. Propensity‐score matching (PSM) was used to adjust confounding. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were used to verify the robustness of results.ResultsWe enrolled 5353 women with term PROM, including 4331 initiated with antibiotic within 6 h, 1022 after 6 h, 5077 within 12 h, and 276 after 12 h. After PSM, no significant difference was observed in the baseline characteristics of the groups. There was no statistical difference between antibiotic use within 6 h and after 6 h, or within 12 h and after 12 h, in puerperal infection (4.6% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.826; 2.9% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.471, respectively), total maternal infection, neonatal sepsis, and total neonatal infection. Cost‐minimization analysis showed there was no significant difference between antibiotic use within 6 h and after 6 h, or within 12 h and after 12 h, in direct medical costs.ConclusionThis study showed that there was no statistical difference in the efficacy and economy of antibiotic prophylaxis used within 6–12 h after rupture of membranes versus after 6–12 h in women with term PROM.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3