MBSE Model Management Pain Points – Wait, this looks familiar!

Author:

Papke Barry1,Hause Matthew2,Hetherington David3,McGervey Sean4,Rodriguez Sami5

Affiliation:

1. Dassault Systemes Las Cruces New Mexico

2. System Strategy, Inc. Round Rock Texas

3. System Strategy, Inc. Austin Texas

4. System Strategy, Inc. Olney Maryland

5. Strategic Technology, Inc. Washington DC

Abstract

AbstractIt has been almost 20 years since INCOSE and the OMG kicked off an effort to create a standardized model‐based systems engineering modeling language. That effort culminated in 2006 with the creation of the Systems Modeling language (SysML). Over the past several years, numerous industries have increased their adoption of SysML and MBSE as a core practice within their engineering lifecycles. However, they have not achieved many of the originally envisioned benefits. On closer inspection, many of the challenges and barriers with which MBSE practitioners are currently struggling are remarkably similar to the problems seen in large DoD software programs from the 1970s and 80s and were resolved decades ago by the software development community regarding scale and complexity. System models are becoming larger and more complex. Yet, in this expanding and maturing MBSE environment, projects continue to experience problems with model integration, repository performance and model lifecycle management. It is time to go back and take another look at how the software community attacked problems of extreme scale.The similarity between MBSE's model management pain points and those experienced years ago by the software industry is not unexpected. Adoption of MBSE requires the replacement of the largely manual, document‐based engineering processes with a complex engineering information processing system. Unlike documents, the models produced by that system are living artifacts that require management over the project lifecycle and which have all the characteristics and complexity of software.This paper presents a framework for MBSE planning and model lifecycle management based on the key practices from Systems Engineering and Software Engineering to provide an actionable set of best practices that can be applied today to address current MBSE lifecycle management issues. We have organized these best practices around three key MBSE Model Management Imperatives.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Automotive Engineering

Reference26 articles.

1. Dahmann J2013 SoS Pain Points & Implications for MBSE Presented at INCOSE IW 2013 Available at

2. Dijkstra Edsger1974 On the Role Of Scientific Thought accessed online November 2005

3. DoD2023 Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) Published by the Defense Standardization Program Available online at:https://www.dsp.dla.mil/Programs/MOSA/

4. Dove R&LaBarge R2014 . Fundamentals of Agile Systems Engineering - Part 1.INCOSE International Symposium 859–875.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3