How Do We Better Serve Excluded Populations When Delivering Digital Health Technology? Inclusion Evaluation of a Digital Musculoskeletal Self‐Management Solution

Author:

Wanless Ben1ORCID,Hassan Nawal2,McClellan Carey3,Sothinathan Christina4,Abelleyra Lastoria Diego Agustín5ORCID,Herweijer Thomas2,Thorpe Jayne2,Noblet Tim1,Berry Alice6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Musculoskeletal Therapy St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK

2. Innovation and Transformation Team NHS South West London Integrated Care Board London UK

3. getUBetter Bristol UK

4. CW Innovation Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Foundation Trust London UK

5. St George's University London London UK

6. School of Health and Social Wellbeing University of the West of England Bristol UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundDigital self‐management platforms have been proposed as a solution to better support people manage their musculoskeletal (MSK) condition. However, research studies often explicitly exclude people who can't access internet connected devices. An important consideration is that digital exclusion (for people without access to an internet connected device) from these new digital options will worsen already existing inequality and inequity in healthcare.AimTo evaluate the acceptability and potential causes of digital exclusion of the South West London (SWL) MSK self‐management app.Objectives(1) Explore why some patients are not using the app and any barriers they have. Explore why some clinicians are not prescribing the app. (2) Make recommendations, based on these findings, to improve digital inclusion.Methods/DesignAn explanatory sequential mixed method service evaluation that consisted of initial questionnaires to identify suitable collaborators, followed by structured interviews of patients and clinicians.ResultsFollowing a comprehensive data analysis, 10 sub‐themes were grouped into four main themes: (1) Beliefs: Importance of understanding the role of digital; face to face consultation is still valued and needed. (2) Barriers: Lack of digital literacy; lack of physical examination/contact with a clinician. (3) Enablers: Immediate access to advice and information; perceived better control over health; ease of use; no appointment needed. (4) Solutions: Support and training; greater awareness.ConclusionsAs digital health technology develops, strategies must change, requiring deliberate work and investments to improve inclusion. Our findings highlight how digital technology design and delivery can be adapted to address the causes of digital exclusion.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3