Forage rotation and tillage effects on soil physical and chemical properties

Author:

Holman Johnathan D.1,Mauler Payton S.1,Obour Augustine K.2ORCID,Roozeboom Kraig L.3ORCID,Simon Logan M.1,Assefa Yared1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Agronomy Kansas State University Garden City Kansas USA

2. Department of Agronomy Kansas State University Hays Kansas USA

3. Department of Agronomy Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA

Abstract

AbstractAnnual forages can be grown more intensively than grain crops, which may have negative impacts on soil health because of biomass removal. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of annual forage crop rotations of varying intensity, diversity, forage removal, and associated tillage practices on soil physical and chemical properties. A long‐term forage study was conducted near Garden City, KS. The six rotation and tillage combination treatments of the study were (1) forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)–forage sorghum (FS–FS) no‐tillage (NT), (2) triticale (×Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus [Secale × Triticum])/FS–FS–oat (Avena sativa L.; T/FS–FS–O) reduced till (RT), (3) T/FS‐FS‐O NT, (4) T/FS–FS–FS‐O NT, (5) T/FS–FS–FS–O RT, and (6) T–FS–O NT. Soil samples were taken in 2021 and 2022 at depths of 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm from the experimental plots and adjacent land used for grain production in a wheat‐sorghum‐fallow rotation. Results of the study indicated that the less intense rotation, T‐FS‐O, had more water stable microaggregates, the grain control had smaller macroaggregates, and T/FS‐FS‐O RT had larger macroaggregates and tended to have fewer small aggregates. Similarly, diverse forage rotations like T‐FS‐FS‐FS‐O had larger sized (2.0–6.3 mm) dry aggregates and tended to have fewer smaller aggregates. The grain control had more medium sized (0.42–0.84 mm) dry aggregate than T/FS‐FS‐O RT. Soil total nitrogen concentrations were less for less diverse or less intense forage rotations compared with the grain control, and soil organic carbon (SOC) and P were less for all forages compared with the grain control, perhaps because forage harvesting reduced crop residue cover and organic matter cycling. We conclude that forage systems that remove biomass from the field should be integrated with management that leaves more residue on the soil surface, such as allowing forage regrowth after hay harvest, alternating between hay removal and grazing, or rotating between forage and grain crops to keep more residue on the soil surface to maintain SOC and protect the soil from erosion.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3