Explore new quinoxaline pharmacophore tethered sulfonamide fragments as in vitro α‐glucosidase, α‐amylase, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with ADMET and molecular modeling simulation

Author:

Ragab Ahmed1ORCID,Salem Mohamed A.2ORCID,Ammar Yousry A.1ORCID,Aboulthana Wael M.3ORCID,Helal Mohamed H.4,Abusaif Moustafa S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science (boys) Al‐Azhar University Nasr Cairo Egypt

2. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Arts King Khalid University, Mohail, Assir Saudi Arabia

3. Biochemistry Department Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki Cairo Egypt

4. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and Science Northern Border University Rafha Saudi Arabia

Abstract

AbstractA new series of quinoxaline‐sulfonamide derivatives 312 were synthesized using fragment‐based drug design by reaction of quinoxaline sulfonyl chloride (QSC) with different amines and hydrazines. The quinoxaline‐sulfonamide derivatives were evaluated for antidiabetic and anti‐Alzheimer's potential against α‐glucosidase, α‐amylase, and acetylcholinesterase enzymes. These derivatives showed good to moderate potency against α‐amylase and α‐glucosidase with inhibitory percentages between 24.34 ± 0.01%–63.09 ± 0.02% and 28.95 ± 0.04%–75.36 ± 0.01%, respectively. Surprisingly, bis‐sulfonamide quinoxaline derivative 4 revealed the most potent activity with inhibitory percentages of 75.36 ± 0.01% and 63.09 ± 0.02% against α‐glucosidase and α‐amylase compared to acarbose (IP = 57.79 ± 0.01% and 67.33 ± 0.01%), respectively. Moreover, the quinoxaline derivative 3 exhibited potency as α‐glucosidase and α‐amylase inhibitory with a minute decline from compound 4 and acarbose with inhibitory percentages of 44.93 ± 0.01% and 38.95 ± 0.01%. Additionally, in vitro acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity for designed derivatives exhibited weak to moderate activity. Still, sulfonamide‐quinoxaline derivative 3 emerged as the most active member with inhibitory percentage of 41.92 ± 0.02% compared with donepezil (IP = 67.27 ± 0.60%). The DFT calculations, docking simulation, target prediction, and ADMET analysis were performed and discussed in detail.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3