Impact of vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. VASC‐OBSERVANT II sub‐study

Author:

Aurigemma Cristina1,Trani Carlo12ORCID,D'Errigo Paola3,Barbanti Marco4,Biancari Fausto5ORCID,Tarantini Giuseppe6ORCID,Santoro Gennaro7,Baiocchi Massimo8,Baglio Giovanni9,Seccareccia Fulvia3,Rosato Stefano3,

Affiliation:

1. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Roma Italy

2. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma Roma Italy

3. National Centre for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità Rome Italy

4. Università degli Studi di Enna "Kore" Enna Italy

5. Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

6. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Division of Cardiology University of Padova Padova Italy

7. Fondazione “ G. Monasterio” CNR/Regione Toscana per la Ricerca Medica e la Sanità Pubblica Massa Italy

8. Policlinico Sant'Orsola Bologna Italy

9. Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services Rome Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTrans‐femoral (TF) access is the commonest approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However this vascular approach is associated with vascular complications (VC) which in turn have prognostic implications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical impact of access site VC in patients undergoing TAVI with newer generation transcatheter prostheses enrolled in the national observational prospective multicenter study OBSERVANT II.MethodsVascular events were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)‐2 criteria. The population enrolled in OBSERVANT II was divided into 3 groups: patients without VC (No‐VC), patients with minor VC or percutaneous closure device failure (Minor‐VC) and patients with major VC (Major‐VC). The primary endpoint was 1‐year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite endpoint of all‐cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization. A multivariate Cox regression model was used for risk estimation of MACCE between the three analyzed groups.Results2.504 patients were included in this analysis: 2.167 patients in No‐VC group; 249 patients in the Minor‐VC and 88 patients in the Major‐VC. At 1‐year Minor‐VC group had a freedom from MACCE comparable to the No‐VC group, while Major‐VC patients had significantly worse outcome (Log‐rank test: p = 0.003). These results were driven by higher 1‐year mortality in the Major‐VC (p < 0.0001). Major‐VC was an independent predictor of MACCE in adjusted analysis (hazard ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.18‐3.03, p = 0.008).ConclusionsDespite a low incidence of major VC with current TF‐TAVI devices, our data confirm that major VC is still associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3