Faecal incontinence with concurrent disorders of gut‐brain interaction: A worse outcome

Author:

Li Sarah G.123ORCID,Mazor Yoav45ORCID,Park Calvin Joomann12ORCID,Jones Michael P.6ORCID,Malcolm Allison12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Neurogastroenterology Unit and Department of Gastroenterology Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards New South Wales Australia

3. Hornsby Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Department of Gastroenterology Rambam Health Care Campus Haifa Israel

5. Department of Medical Neurobiology The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel

6. Department of Psychology Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFaecal incontinence is a common debilitating condition associated with poor quality of life that generates substantial economic strain on healthcare systems.ObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate, in a tertiary referral population presenting with faecal incontinence, the impact of suffering additional disorders of gut‐brain interaction (DGBI) on symptom severity, anxiety, depression and quality of life.MethodsDesign: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral Neurogastroenterology centre. Patients: All patients presenting with faecal incontinence from 2007 to 2020 were included. Main Outcome Measures: The results from structured medical and surgical questionnaires including Rome III Integrative Questionnaire, Faecal Incontinence Severity Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SF‐36, and anorectal physiology were analysed using Stata version 17. Patients were categorised into 3 groups: 0–1 additional DGBI, 2 DGBIs, and 3+ DGBI. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 (two‐tailed).Key ResultsFaecal incontinence patients (n = 249; mean age 63.4 ± 12.6 years; 93.6% female, 48.1% urge subtype) met diagnostic criteria for mean 2.2 additional DGBI each, mostly affecting bowel (n = 231, 42.4%) and anorectal (n = 150, 27.5%) regions. A greater number of DGBIs was associated with higher faecal incontinence symptom severity (p < 0.001), higher anxiety (p = 0.002) and depression (p = 0.003), and worse quality of life in areas of mental health (p = 0.037) and social effect (p < 0.001). Patients with a greater number of concurrent DGBI demonstrated a greater family history of gastrointestinal problems (p = 0.004). There were no associations found between a greater amount of DGBIs and anorectal physiology.Conclusions and InferencesA greater number of additional DGBIs in faecal incontinence patients was associated with worse faecal incontinence symptoms, higher anxiety and depression scores, and worse quality of life but was unrelated to physiology. This highlights the need to proactively search for comorbid DGBI in patients presenting with faecal incontinence.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3