1. Anderson DF Chisholm CM Khan A Kvansakul J Barbur JL Gartry DS Prospective, randomised, double-masked pilot study of conventional versus wavefront-guided LASIK: visual and refractive outcomes Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2004 45 13 ARVO E abstract 1101
2. Rivers B Ryan DS Sia RK Peppers L Logan LA Eaddy JB Visual performance after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2014 55 13 ARVO E abstract 1525
3. Ryan DS Sia RK Deaver DM Maurer T Howell CL Logan LA Visual outcomes and the identification of static and dynamic targets of military interest after wavefront-guided (WFG) and wavefront-optimized (WFO) photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2014 55 13 ARVO E abstract 1522
4. Ryan DS Sia RK Peppers L Eaddy JB Stutzman RD Pasternak J Visual performance of U.S military service members (USM) in identification of infrared targets after wavefront-guided (WFG) and wavefront-optimized (WFO) photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and LASIK Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2016 57 12 ARVO E abstract 4861
5. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: visual and military task performance;Ryan;Military Medicine,2017