Physical therapist–led interventions based on the biopsychosocial model provide improvement in disability and pain for spinal disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Miki Takahiro123ORCID,Kondo Yu1ORCID,Kurakata Hiroshi4,Takebayashi Tsuneo5,Samukawa Mina2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Sapporo Maruyama Orthopedic Hospital Sapporo Japan

2. Faculty of Health Sciences Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido Japan

3. Graduate school Saitama Prefectural University Koshigaya Saitama Japan

4. Department of Rehabilitation Yumenomachi Home Nursing Care and Rehabilitation Service Chiba Japan

5. Department of Orthopedic Sapporo Maruyama Orthopedic Hospital Sapporo Japan

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo summarize the effects of physical therapist–led interventions based on the biopsychosocial (BPS) model in spinal disorders compared to interventions with no BPS model through a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized‐controlled trials.TypeSystematic review and meta‐analysis.Literature SurveyWe searched the Web of Science, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PEDro up to October 27, 2022.MethodologyPain intensity and disability were primary outcomes and psychological factors were secondary outcomes in spinal disorders. The included intervention was physical therapist–led interventions based on the BPS model. The control group received no physiotherapy intervention for BPS. Pooled effects were analyzed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the random‐effects model was used for the meta‐analysis. The subgroup analysis was divided into low back pain group and neck pain group. Another subgroup analysis was conducted only of the groups that had received training of the BPS model.SynthesisFifty‐seven studies with 5471 participants met the inclusion criteria. For pain intensity, there was a statistically significant effect for the BPS model led by physical therapists in the short, medium, and long terms. The SMDs with 95% CIs were −0.44 (−0.62, −0.27), −0.24 (−0.37, −0.12), and −0.17 (−0.28, −0.06), respectively. Outcomes were clinically significant, except in the long term. For disability, there was a statistically significant effect in the short, medium, and long terms. The SMDs with 95% CIs were −0.48 (−0.69, −0.27), −0.44 (−0.64, −0.25), and −0.37 (−0.58, −0.15), respectively. All periods were clinically significant. The quality of the evidence was low for all of the main outcomes for all of the terms.ConclusionPhysical therapist–led interventions based on the BPS model effectively improve pain intensity and disability in patients with spinal disorders based on low‐quality evidence.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3