Free‐style technique versus computed tomographic angiography‐guided perforator selection in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest: A prospective clinical study

Author:

Santanelli di Pompeo Fabio1ORCID,Paolini Guido1,D'Orsi Gennaro1,Atzeni Matteo2ORCID,Catalano Carlo3,Cannavale Giuseppe3,Cilia Francesco3ORCID,Firmani Guido1ORCID,Sorotos Michail1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology Sapienza University of Rome ‐ Sant'Andrea Hospital Rome Italy

2. Department of Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Cagliari Cagliari Italy

3. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundComputed tomographic angiography (CTA) is the preferred diagnostic tool in preoperative deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap assessment, though some surgeons prefer approaching perforator selection with intraoperative findings alone.MethodsThis prospective observational study conducted between 2015 and 2020 assessed our intraoperative decision‐making “free‐style” technique for DIEP flap harvest. Any patient with indication for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps and who received preoperative CTA was enrolled. Only unilateral cases performed by the same surgeon were considered. Allergy to iodine‐based contrast media, renal impairment and claustrophobia were other exclusion criteria. Primary endpoint consisted in comparing operative times and complication rates between free‐style technique and CTA‐guided approach. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of agreement rate between intraoperative findings and CTA, and identification of variables affecting operative time and complication rate. Demographics, surgical information, agreement versus non‐agreement and complications were collected.ResultsStarting from 206 patients, 100 were enrolled. Fifty were assigned to Group A, receiving DIEP flap with free‐style technique. The other 50 were assigned to Group B, receiving DIEP flap with CTA‐guided perforators selection. Study groups' demographics were homogenous. Operative time was statistically lower (p = .036) in free‐style group (252.4 ± 44.77 min vs. 265.6 ± 31.67 min). Complication rates were higher in CTA‐guided group (10% vs. 2%) though this was not significant (p = .092). Overall agreement rate in dominant perforator selection between intraoperatively and CTA‐based assessment was 81%. Multiple regression analysis showed no variable increased complication rate, though CTA‐guided approach, BMI > 30 and harvesting more than one perforator were respectively associated with B‐coefficient of 17.391 (2.430–32.351, 95% CI) [p = .023], 3.50 (0.640–6.379, 95% CI) [p = .017] and 18.887 (6.232–31.542, 95% CI) [p = .004], predicting increased operative time.ConclusionsThe free‐style technique proved to be a useful tool for guiding DIEP flap harvest with good sensibility in detecting the dominant perforator suggested by CTA without statistically increasing surgery duration and complications.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3