Salivary proteomic profile of response to different resistance training protocols: A case report

Author:

Santos Karina Oliveira1,Filho Dalton Muller Pessôa23,Ventura Talita Mendes Oliveira1,Thomassian Larissa Tercilia Grizzo1,Macedo Anderson Geremias24,Buzalaf Marília Afonso Rabelo1,Braga Aline Silva1,Faria Murilo Henrique5,Magalhães Ana Carolina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo (USP) Bauru São Paulo Brazil

2. Post‐graduate Program in Human Development and Technology, Bioscience Institute (IB) São Paulo State University (UNESP) Rio Claro São Paulo Brazil

3. Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences (FC) São Paulo State University (UNESP) Bauru São Paulo Brazil

4. Pos‐Graduation Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Institute of Motricity Sciences Federal University of Alfenas, Santa Clara Campus Alfenas Minas Gerais Brazil

5. Human Movement Research Laboratory (MOVI‐LAB), Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) Bauru São Paulo Brazil

Abstract

AbstractResistance training (RT) with blood flow restriction (BFR) or high intensity (HI) are effective to increase muscle mass. To understand this effect, techniques known as “omics” are used to identify possible biomarkers. This study analyzed the salivary proteomic profile of healthy individuals trained before and after two RT protocols both designed with eight exercises for upper‐ and lower‐limbs, one performed at low percentage of one‐maximum repetition (%1RM) with BFR technique, and other at high %1RM (HI) without BRF technique. Four healthy males between 18 and 28 years participated in the study. Stimulated saliva was collected before (BBFR/BHI) and immediately after (ABFR/AHI) the two RT protocols. All protein‐related processing was performed using label‐free proteomic. The difference in expression between groups was expressed as p < .05 for downregulated proteins and 1‐p > .95 for upregulated proteins. There was difference in salivary flow between ABFR and BBFR (p = .005). For HI, 87 proteins were found after the practice and 119 before. Three hemoglobin isoforms were increased in AHI compared with BHI. In the BFR comparison, 105 proteins were identified after (ABFR) and 70 before (BBFR). Among those increased ABFR, we highlight five hemoglobin isoforms and Deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 protein. Between ABFR and AHI, 17 isoforms of histones, Transaldolase, Transketolase, Glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase, and Antileukoproteinase were decreased ABFR. For HI, there was an increase in proteins related to oxidative stress and metabolism of the musculoskeletal system, compared with BFR. HI seems to induce higher anabolic signaling to muscle mass increase and antiatherosclerotic effects.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cell Biology,Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine,Biochemistry

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3