Breaking barriers, building faculty: A qualitative analysis to exploring faculty development in academic hospital medicine

Author:

Badawy Jack1ORCID,Sakumoto Matthew2ORCID,Murphy Elizabeth3,Schmit David1,Davis Christine1,Segon Ankur1ORCID,Auerbach Andrew2ORCID,Burden Marisha4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hospital Medicine University of Texas Health San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA

2. Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco California USA

3. Department of Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences Chicago Illinois USA

4. Division of Hospital Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHospital medicine (HM) continues to be primarily composed of junior hospitalists and research has highlighted a paucity of mentors and academic output. Faculty advancement programs have been identified as a means to support junior hospitalists in their career trajectories and to advance the field. The optimal approach to supporting faculty development (FD) efforts is not known.ObjectiveTo understand hospitalist groups' approaches to FD, including efforts that were perceived to be effective, and to identify barriers as well as potential future directions for FD.DesignRapid qualitative methods were utilized including templated summaries and matrix analysis to identify major themes.Setting and ParticipantsVirtual focus groups with hospitalists in the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN).Main Outcome and MeasuresQualitative themes.ResultsNineteen individuals from 17 unique institutions from across the United States in May 2022 participated in seven focus groups. Four key themes emerged from the study and included (1) academic hospitalist programs face multifaceted challenges and barriers to FD in HM, (2) groups have embraced a diversity of structures and frameworks, (3) due to clinical volumes, FD programs have had to adapt and evolve to meet FD needs, and (4) participants identified multiple areas for improvement, including defining tangible outcomes of FD programs and creating a repository of FD material which can be shared widely.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3