The bodily threat monitoring scale: Development and preliminary validation in adult and childhood cancer survivors

Author:

Heathcote Lauren C.1,Webster Sarah N.2ORCID,Loecher Nele3,Spunt Sheri L.4,Simon Pamela4,Pradhan Poorva5,Coutts‐Bain Daelin5,Sharpe Louise5ORCID,Tutelman Perri R.6,Simons Laura E.2

Affiliation:

1. Health Psychology Section Department of Psychology Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK

2. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

3. Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences St Jude's Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA

4. Department of Pediatric Oncology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

5. The School of Psychology University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveBodily threat monitoring is a core clinical feature of Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and is targeted in psycho‐oncology treatments, yet no comprehensive self‐report measure exists. The aim of this study was the theory‐informed development and initial validation of the Bodily Threat Monitoring Scale (BTMS).MethodsAdult survivors of breast and gynaecological cancers (Study 1: N = 306, age = 37–81 years) and childhood cancer survivors (Study 2: N = 126, age = 10–25 years) completed the BTMS, designed to assess how individuals monitor for and interpret uncertain symptoms as indicating that something is wrong with their body. Participants completed measures to assess construct and criterion validity of the BTMS, and childhood cancer survivors (Study 2) completed the BTMS again 2 weeks later to assess test‐retest reliability.ResultsThe 19‐item BTMS demonstrated excellent internal consistency across adult and childhood cancer samples (α = 0.90–0.96). Factor analyses indicated two subscales capturing 1. Monitoring of bodily sensations and 2. Threatening interpretations of bodily sensations. Two‐week stability estimates were acceptable. For construct validity, the BTMS correlated with body vigilance and anxiety sensitivity. The BTMS also demonstrated criterion validity, yielding significant associations with FCR, intolerance of uncertainty, help‐seeking behaviours, and quality of life. The BTMS was associated with FCR while controlling for body vigilance and anxiety sensitivity, indicating a unique contribution of this theory‐informed measure.ConclusionsThe BTMS shows evidence of sound psychometric properties and could be used to elucidate the role of bodily threat monitoring in the maintenance and management of FCR.

Funder

Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Oncology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3