Do reconstructive techniques for osteochondritis dissecans of the skeletally mature knee work? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractPurposeOsteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a common cause of knee pain. Management for adult‐onset OCD (AOCD) usually involves surgery. Surgical treatments include palliative, reparative and reconstructive techniques. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of reconstructive techniques for the treatment of OCD in skeletally mature knees.MethodsA systematic search was carried out on four databases up to November 2023 (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science). The study was registered on international prospective register of systematic reviews and performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis guidelines. Clinical studies on skeletally mature patients were included, which utilised reconstructive techniques such as autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), matrix‐induced autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral allograft transplantation surgery or bone marrow‐derived cellular transplantation. Demographical data, patient‐reported outcome measures and postoperative complications were recorded. Quantitative outcome measures that were comparable across studies were pooled for meta‐analysis. A random effects model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias in non‐randomised studies ‐ of interventions tool for nonrandomised studies.ResultsSixteen studies were included with 458 OCD lesions in 432 patients. The average age was 24.9, and 62.6% were male. The mean follow‐up time was 61.5 months. At 36 months follow‐up, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective, Tegner and EuroQol‐visual analogue scale (EQ‐VAS) scores improved from 42.4 to 78.6 (standard mean difference [SMD]: 2.47; p < 0.001), 2.27–4.99 (SMD: 2.363; p = 0.002) and 30.4–57.5 (SMD: 2.390; p < 0.001), respectively. Overall complication rate was 8.9%. Smaller OCD lesion sizes resulted in a greater improvement in IKDC subjective (SMD: 2.64 vs. 2.01; p = 0.038), EQ‐VAS (SMD: 3.16 vs. 0.95; p = 0.046) and Tegner scores (SMD: 3.13 vs. 1.05; p = 0.007) and had a lower complication rate (p = 0.008). Males showed a larger improvement in IKDC subjective scores than females (SMD: 2.56 vs. 1.56; p = 0.029), while younger patients had a larger improvement in IKDC subjective scores (SMD: 2.71 vs. 2.12; p = 0.045) and fewer complications than older patients (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between cohorts treated with ACI and those treated with non‐ACI reconstructive techniques. Publication bias was not detected (n.s.).ConclusionReconstructive techniques used to treat OCD in the skeletally mature knee resulted in significant improvements in clinical and functional outcomes, with a low overall complication rate. Since a younger age leads to a greater improvement in IKDC subjective score and a lower complication rate, surgical intervention should not be delayed, especially in AOCD lesions which are more likely to follow a progressive and unremitting clinical course.Level of EvidenceLevel III.