Implementation strategies of cervical cancer screening in South Asia: A systematic review

Author:

Sabeena Sasidharanpillai1ORCID,Ravishankar Nagaraja2ORCID,Kalpana MM3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lalitpur Bagmati Province, Kathmandu Nepal

2. Department of Biostatistics, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute University of Delhi New Delhi India

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Government Medical College Kozhikode Kerala India

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCervical cancer is a preventable cancer by screening, vaccination and timely management of preinvasive cervical lesions. However, about 90% of the global burden of cervical cancer is reported from developing countries.ObjectiveThis systematic review aimed to analyze the strategies implemented for cervical cancer screening in South Asia.Search StrategyAn electronic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar was carried out for articles published in English, evaluating the implementation of cervical cancer screening between December 2000 and June 2023 in South Asia using appropriate search terms.Selection CriteriaCross‐sectional studies, randomized control trials (RCTs) or non‐randomized controlled trials evaluating different cervical screening strategies were included.Data Collection and AnalysisA three‐stage selection process was performed using a validated proforma including the title, author, year of publication, objective, country, study design, screening methods, strategies and outcomes, and results. The systematic review was designed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's (NHLBI) Quality Assessment Tools.Main ResultsOut of the initial 1135 articles reviewed systematically, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis of results. The implementation outcomes measured were acceptability (n = 23 100%), feasibility (n = 22, 95.7%), fidelity (n = 14, 60.9%), sustainability (n = 7, 30.4%), coverage (n = 4, 17.4%) and cost (n = 1, 4.3%).ConclusionCervical cancer screening can be effectively implemented by restructuring the ongoing programs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3