Mixed methods evaluation of the Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience intervention

Author:

Afulani Patience A.12ORCID,Getahun Monica2,Okiring Jaffer3,Ogolla Beryl A.4,Oboke Edwina N.4,Kinyua Joyceline5,Oluoch Iscar6,Odiase Osamuedeme2,Ochiel Dan7,Mendes Wendy Berry8,Ongeri Linnet5

Affiliation:

1. Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department University of California San Francisco California USA

2. Institute for Global Health Sciences University of California San Francisco California USA

3. Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration Kampala Uganda

4. Global Programs for Research and Training Nairobi Kenya

5. Kenya Medical Research Institute Nairobi Kenya

6. County Executive Committee Migori Kenya

7. County Health Directorate Migori Kenya

8. Department of Psychology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the impact of the Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience (CPIPE) intervention, which sought to improve person‐centered maternal care (PCMC) by addressing two key drivers: provider stress and bias.MethodsCPIPE was successfully piloted over 6 months in two health facilities in Migori County, Kenya, in 2022. The evaluation employed a mixed‐methods pretest–posttest nonequivalent control group design. Data are from surveys with 80 providers (40 intervention, 40 control) at baseline and endline and in‐depth interviews with 20 intervention providers. We conducted bivariate, multivariate, and difference‐in‐difference analysis of quantitative data and thematic analysis of qualitative data.ResultsIn the intervention group, average knowledge scores increased from 7.8 (SD = 2.4) at baseline to 9.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.8) at endline for stress (P = 0.001) and from 8.9 (SD = 1.9) to 10.7 (SD = 1.7) for bias (P = 0.001). In addition, perceived stress scores decreased from 20.9 (SD = 3.9) to 18.6 (SD = 5.3) (P = 0.019) and burnout from 3.6 (SD = 1.0) to 3.0 (SD = 1.0) (P = 0.001), with no significant change in the control group. Qualitative data indicated that CPIPE had an impact at multiple levels. At the individual level, it improved provider knowledge, skills, self‐efficacy, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences. At the interpersonal level, it improved provider–provider and patient–provider relationships, leading to a supportive work environment and improved PCMC. At the institutional level, it created a system of accountability for providing PCMC and nondiscriminatory care, and collective action and advocacy to address sources of stress.ConclusionCPIPE impacted multiple outcomes in the theory of change, leading to improvements in both provider and patient experience, including for the most vulnerable patients. These findings will contribute to global efforts to prevent burnout and promote PCMC and equity.

Funder

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3