An integrated intervention programme for couples facing colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial

Author:

Wang Zhiming1,Chen Meizhen1,Cao Qian1,Gong Jiali1,Zhao Jie2,Lin Chunyan2,Luo Huamin2,Wu Xinyu2,Chen Ying2,Li Qiuping12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Wuxi School of Medicine Jiangnan University Wuxi Jiangsu Province China

2. Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University Wuxi Jiangsu Province China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundUnder the guidance of a preliminary Live with Love Conceptual Framework, a Caring for Couples Coping with Colorectal Cancer (4Cs: CRC) programme was designed specifically for colorectal cancer couples. The objectives of this study included examining the efficacy of the programme for couples adapting to colorectal cancer and comparing the effects of different intervention delivery modes (online, face‐to‐face and blended) on couple outcomes.MethodsA four‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted among Chinese colorectal cancer couples. Couples were randomly assigned to an online intervention, a face‐to‐face intervention, a blended intervention or a control group. Self‐efficacy, dyadic coping, communication and dyadic outcomes (physical and mental health, negative and positive emotions and marital satisfaction) were evaluated at baseline and 6 weeks later. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA were employed to assess between‐group differences and within‐group effects in the four groups, respectively.ResultsA total of 179 couples completed the 6‐week study and post‐study assessments. The intervention showed generally medium‐to‐large effects across multiple measured outcomes, including self‐efficacy, dyadic coping, communication, mental health, negative emotions and positive emotions for both patients and spouse caregivers. Additionally, interventions delivered through different modes produced equally significant effects on couple outcomes.ConclusionsThe integrated intervention programme is effective in improving cancer adaptation in colorectal cancer couples. Long‐term follow‐up and a mix of quantitative and qualitative assessments are crucial for further evaluation of the programme.Trial registrationRetroactive registration is under review.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Clinical Psychology

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3