The Psychological, Physiological, and Behavioral Responses of Patients to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Madl Janika E.M.12ORCID,Nieto Alvarez Isabel234,Amft Oliver345,Rohleder Nicolas1,Becker Linda16

Affiliation:

1. Chair of Health Psychology, Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany

2. Siemens Healthcare GmbH Erlangen Germany

3. Chair of Digital Health, Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany

4. Intelligent Embedded Systems Lab, University of Freiburg Freiburg im Breisgau Germany

5. Hahn‐Schickard Freiburg im Breisgau Germany

6. Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Vinzenz Pallotti University Vallendar Germany

Abstract

BackgroundMRI is generally well‐tolerated although it may induce physiological stress responses and anxiety in patients.PurposeInvestigate the psychological, physiological, and behavioral responses of patients to MRI, their evolution over time, and influencing factors.Study TypeSystematic review with meta‐analysis.Population181,371 adult patients from 44 studies undergoing clinical MRI.AssessmentPubmed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Quality appraisal was conducted with the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Meta‐analysis was conducted via Meta‐Essentials workbooks when five studies were available for an outcome. Psychological and behavioral outcomes could be analyzed. Psychological outcomes were anxiety (State–Trait‐Anxiety Inventory, STAI‐S; 37) and willingness to undergo MRI again. Behavioral outcomes included unexpected behaviors: No shows, sedation, failed scans, and motion artifacts. Year of publication, sex, age, and positioning were examined as moderators.Statistical TestsMeta‐analysis, Hedge's g. A P value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.ResultsOf 12,755 initial studies, 104 studies were included in methodological review and 44 (181,371 patients) in meta‐analysis. Anxiety did not significantly reduce from pre‐ to post‐MRI (Hedge's g = −0.20, P = 0.051). Pooled values of STAI‐S (37) were 44.93 (pre‐MRI) and 40.36 (post‐MRI). Of all patients, 3.9% reported unwillingness to undergo MRI again. Pooled prevalence of unexpected patient behavior was 11.4%; rates for singular behaviors were: Failed scans, 2.1%; no‐shows, 11.5%; sedation, 3.3%; motion artifacts, 12.2%. Year of publication was not a significant moderator (all P > 0.169); that is, the patients' response was not improved in recent vs. older studies. Meta‐analysis of physiological responses was not feasible since preconditions were not met for any outcome.Data ConclusionAdvancements of MRI technology alone may not be sufficient to eliminate anxiety in patients undergoing MRI and related unexpected behaviors.Level of Evidence1Technical EfficacyStage 5

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3