Clinical Breast MRI‐based Radiomics for Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Lesions: An Analysis of Sequences and Enhanced Phases

Author:

Wang Guangsong1ORCID,Guo Qiu1,Shi Dafa1ORCID,Zhai Huige2,Luo Wenbin2,Zhang Haoran1,Ren Zhendong1,Yan Gen2,Ren Ke13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University Xiamen Fujian China

2. Department of Radiology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College Xiamen Fujian China

3. Xiamen Key Laboratory of Endocrine‐Related Cancer Precision Medicine Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen university Xiamen Fujian China

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies have used different imaging sequences and different enhanced phases for breast lesion calsification in radiomics. The optimal sequence and contrast enhanced phase is unclear.PurposeTo identify the optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics model for lesion clarification, and to simulate its incremental value for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)‐guided biopsy.Study TypeRetrospective.Population329 female patients (138 malignant, 191 benign), divided into a training set (first site, n = 192) and an independent test set (second site, n = 137).Field Strength/Sequence3.0‐T, fast spoiled gradient‐echo and fast spin‐echo T1‐weighted imaging (T1WI), fast spin‐echo T2‐weighted imaging (T2WI), echo‐planar diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and fast spoiled gradient‐echo contrast‐enhanced MRI (CE‐MRI).AssessmentTwo breast radiologists with 3 and 10 years' experience developed radiomics model on CE‐MRI, CE‐MRI + DWI, CE‐MRI + DWI + T2WI, CE‐MRI + DWI + T2WI + T1WI at each individual phase (P) and for multiple combinations of phases. The optimal radiomics model (Rad‐score) was identified as having the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the test set. Specificity was compared between a traditional mpMRI model and an integrated model (mpMRI + Rad‐score) at sensitivity >98%.Statistical TestsWilcoxon paired‐samples signed rank test, Delong test, McNemar test. Significance level was 0.05 and Bonferroni method was used for multiple comparisons (P = 0.007, 0.05/7).ResultsFor radiomics models, CE‐MRI/P3 + DWI + T2WI achieved the highest performance in the test set (AUC = 0.888, 95% confidence interval: 0.833–0.944). The integrated model had significantly higher specificity (55.3%) than the mpMRI model (31.6%) in the test set with a sensitivity of 98.4%.Data ConclusionThe CE‐MRI/P3 + DWI + T2WI model is the optimized choice for breast lesion classification in radiomics, and has potential to reduce benign biopsies (100%–specificity) from 68.4% to 44.7% while retaining sensitivity >98%.Level of Evidence3Technical EfficacyStage 2

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3