Percentage of Pancreatic Cysts on MRI With a Pancreatic Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Elmi Nika1,McEvoy David1,McInnes Matthew D.F.23ORCID,Alabousi Mostafa1ORCID,Hecht Elizabeth M.4ORCID,Luk Lyndon5,Asghar Sunna1,Jajodia Ankush1,de Carvalho Tiago Lins1,Warnica William J.1,Zha Nanxi1,Ullah Sadaf6,van der Pol Christian B.17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

2. Department of Radiology and Epidemiology University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

3. Department of Medical Imaging Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital‐Civic Campus Ottawa Ontario Canada

4. Department of Radiology Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA

5. Department of Radiology New York Presbyterian–Columbia University Medical Center New York New York USA

6. Library Services Unity Health Toronto St. Michael's Hospital, East Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute Toronto Ontario Canada

7. Department of Diagnostic Imaging Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences Hamilton Ontario Canada

Abstract

BackgroundPancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are frequent on MRI and are thought to be associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) necessitating long‐term surveillance based on older studies suffering from selection bias.PurposeTo establish the percentage of patients with PCLs on MRI with a present or future PDAC.Study TypeSystematic review, meta‐analysis.PopulationAdults with PCLs on MRI and a present or future diagnosis of PDAC were eligible. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched to April 2022 (PROSPERO:CRD42022320502). Studies limited to PCLs not requiring surveillance, <100 patients, or those with a history/genetic risk of PDAC were excluded.Field Strength/Sequence≥1.5 T with ≥1 T2‐weighted sequence.AssessmentTwo investigators extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by a third. QUADAS‐2 assessed bias. PDAC was diagnosed using a composite reference standard.Statistical TestsA meta‐analysis of proportions was performed at the patient‐level with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).ResultsEight studies with 1289 patients contributed to the percentage of patients with a present diagnosis of PDAC, and 10 studies with 3422 patients to the percentage with a future diagnosis. Of patients with PCLs on MRI, 14.8% (95% CI 2.4–34.9) had a PDAC at initial MRI, which decreased to 6.0% (2.2–11.3) for studies at low risk of bias. For patients without PDAC on initial MRI, 2.0% (1.1–3.2) developed PDAC during surveillance, similar for low risk of bias studies at 1.9% (0.7–3.6), with no clear trend of increased PDAC for longer surveillance durations. For patients without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata, 0.9% (0.1–2.2) developed PDAC during surveillance. Of 10, eight studies had a median surveillance ≥3 years (range 3–157 months). Sources of bias included retrospectively limiting PCLs to those with histopathology and inconsistent surveillance protocols.Data ConclusionA low percentage of patients with PCLs on MRI develop PDAC while on surveillance. The first MRI revealing a PCL should be scrutinized for PDAC.Level of Evidence3Technical EfficacyStage 2

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3