Topical Steroids and Antibiotics for Adult Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Author:

Zhao Lu1ORCID,Sun Ya-jie2,Pan Zhi-qiang1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Henan Eye Institute, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

Abstract

Purpose. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical treatments (including steroids and antibiotics) for adults with blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC). Methods. The following databases were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs): China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database (CENTRAL). Two reviewers selected studies and analyzed the risk of bias independently. The treatments were loteprednol 0.5%/tobramycin 0.3% (LE/T) and dexamethasone 0.1%/tobramycin 0.3% (DM/T). The efficacy outcome measures were change from baseline (CFB) in composite scores of ocular symptoms and signs; the CFB in the signs composite scores for blepharitis, conjunctivitis, and keratitis at each visit; the total ocular adverse event incidence (AEs); and the incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP) increase after treatment. Prepost mean differences (MDs) were compared for continuous outcome variables, and incidences were analyzed for dichotomous data. The pooled effect sizes were analyzed using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q-test and I2 statistic. Results. The CFB to final visit in ocular symptoms and signs of BKC was not statistically different between the two treatments (95% CI, −0.33 to 1.50; MD = 0.58; P = 0.21 ). The CFB in signs composite scores for blepharitis (95% CI, −0.16 to 0.48; MD = 0.16; P = 0.32 ), conjunctivitis (95% CI, −0.55 to 1.76; MD = 0.61; P = 0.30 ), and keratitis (95% CI, 0.00–0.28; MD = 0.14; P = 0.05 ) was also similar with the two treatments. LE/T was a safer intervention than DM/T, with fewer overall adverse events (95% CI, 0.34–0.80; RR = 0.52; P = 0.003 ) and significantly less elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) (95% CI, 0.32–0.70; RR = 0.47; P = 0.0002 ). Conclusions. DM/T and LE/T are both effective treatments for BKC, but LE/T may be a safer intervention.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3